204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11550746)
1. Empirical analysis of the intrinsic-extrinsic distinction of judgments of learning (JOLs): effects of relatedness and serial position on JOLs.
Dunlosky J; Matvey G
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Sep; 27(5):1180-91. PubMed ID: 11550746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Metacognition and learning about primacy and recency effects in free recall: the utilization of intrinsic and extrinsic cues when making judgments of learning.
Castel AD
Mem Cognit; 2008 Mar; 36(2):429-37. PubMed ID: 18426071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
Jang Y; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of categorical relatedness on judgements of learning (JOLs).
Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Schwartz BL
Memory; 2006 Feb; 14(2):253-61. PubMed ID: 16484114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Judgments of learning as memory modifiers.
Soderstrom NC; Clark CT; Halamish V; Bjork EL
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Mar; 41(2):553-8. PubMed ID: 25528101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of making judgments of learning on memory performance: Positive, negative, or both?
Janes JL; Rivers ML; Dunlosky J
Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2356-2364. PubMed ID: 29611141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
Illman NA; Morrison CM
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The interplay between value and relatedness as bases for metacognitive monitoring and control: evidence for agenda-based monitoring.
Soderstrom NC; McCabe DP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1236-42. PubMed ID: 21574750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Why do judgments of learning modify memory? Evidence from identical pairs and relatedness judgments.
Halamish V; Undorf M
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):547-556. PubMed ID: 36006723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Encoding fluency is a cue used for judgments about learning.
Hertzog C; Dunlosky J; Robinson AE; Kidder DP
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Jan; 29(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 12549580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tradeoff of semantic relatedness and degree of overlearning: differential effects on metamemory and on long-term retention.
Carroll M; Nelson TO; Kirwan A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 1997 Apr; 95(3):239-53. PubMed ID: 9112803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Familiarity and retrieval processes in delayed judgments of learning.
Metcalfe J; Finn B
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Sep; 34(5):1084-97. PubMed ID: 18763893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. When people's judgments of learning (JOLs) are extremely accurate at predicting subsequent recall: the "Displaced-JOL effect".
Bui Y; Pyc MA; Bailey H
Memory; 2018 Jul; 26(6):771-783. PubMed ID: 29187067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Importance of the kind of cue for judgments of learning (JOL) and the delayed-JOL effect.
Dunlosky J; Nelson TO
Mem Cognit; 1992 Jul; 20(4):374-80. PubMed ID: 1495399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Judgments of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall.
Mazzoni G; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1995 Sep; 21(5):1263-74. PubMed ID: 8744965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Simultaneous utilization of multiple cues in judgments of learning.
Undorf M; Söllner A; Bröder A
Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):507-519. PubMed ID: 29327336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of proactive interference (PI) and release from PI on judgments of learning.
Diaz M; Benjamin AS
Mem Cognit; 2011 Feb; 39(2):196-203. PubMed ID: 21264631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The neurocognitive basis of metamemory: Using the N400 to study the contribution of fluency to judgments of learning.
Undorf M; Amaefule CO; Kamp SM
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Mar; 169():107176. PubMed ID: 32001337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The contributions of anchoring and past-test performance to the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
England BD; Serra MJ
Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):715-22. PubMed ID: 22477335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiple bases for young and older adults' judgments of learning in multitrial learning.
Tauber SK; Rhodes MG
Psychol Aging; 2012 Jun; 27(2):474-83. PubMed ID: 21942899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
