These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11550746)

  • 21. Judgments of learning (JOLs) selectively improve memory depending on the type of test.
    Myers SJ; Rhodes MG; Hausman HE
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jul; 48(5):745-758. PubMed ID: 32124334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate?
    Pyc MA; Rawson KA; Aschenbrenner AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):886-97. PubMed ID: 24643790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The deceptive nature of associative word pairs: the effects of associative direction on judgments of learning.
    Maxwell NP; Huff MJ
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1757-1775. PubMed ID: 32333106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do judgments of learning modify older adults' actual learning?
    Tauber SK; Witherby AE
    Psychol Aging; 2019 Sep; 34(6):836-847. PubMed ID: 31259565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice.
    Metcalfe J; Finn B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Feb; 15(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 18605499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Predicting memory performance under conditions of proactive interference: immediate and delayed judgments of learning.
    Wahlheim CN
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Jul; 39(5):827-38. PubMed ID: 21264574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Metamemory judgments and the benefits of repeated study: improving recall predictions through the activation of appropriate knowledge.
    Tiede HL; Leboe JP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):822-8. PubMed ID: 19379052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Judgments of learning enhance recall for category-cued but not letter-cued items.
    Rivers ML; Dunlosky J; Janes JL; Witherby AE; Tauber SK
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Oct; 51(7):1547-1561. PubMed ID: 37173589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of the difficulty of prior items on the magnitude of judgments of learning for subsequent items.
    Richards RM; Nelson TO
    Am J Psychol; 2004; 117(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 15058858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Metamemory adjustments over time in adults with and without traumatic brain injury.
    Krause M; Kennedy MR
    Brain Inj; 2009 Nov; 23(12):965-72. PubMed ID: 19831493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: evidence from judgments of learning.
    Castel AD; McCabe DP; Roediger HL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 17546739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effects of list composition and perceptual fluency on judgments of learning (JOLs).
    Susser JA; Mulligan NW; Besken M
    Mem Cognit; 2013 Oct; 41(7):1000-11. PubMed ID: 23661189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Hindsight bias in metamemory: outcome knowledge influences the recollection of judgments of learning.
    Zimdahl MF; Undorf M
    Memory; 2021 May; 29(5):559-572. PubMed ID: 33896394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Judgments of learning: evidence for a two-stage process.
    Son LK; Metcalfe J
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Sep; 33(6):1116-29. PubMed ID: 16496730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Slow judgments of learning predict familiarity-based memories as measured by the remember-know task.
    Jang Y
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2022 Nov; 48(11):1618-1637. PubMed ID: 34516209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. When will bigger be (recalled) better? The influence of category size on JOLs depends on test format.
    Hourihan KL; Tullis JG
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):910-21. PubMed ID: 25758175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigating memory reactivity with a within-participant manipulation of judgments of learning: support for the cue-strengthening hypothesis.
    Rivers ML; Janes JL; Dunlosky J
    Memory; 2021 Nov; 29(10):1342-1353. PubMed ID: 34635008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Contributions of beliefs and processing fluency to the effect of relatedness on judgments of learning.
    Mueller ML; Tauber SK; Dunlosky J
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2013 Apr; 20(2):378-84. PubMed ID: 23188739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The relatedness effect on judgments of learning: A closer look at the contribution of processing fluency.
    Undorf M; Erdfelder E
    Mem Cognit; 2015 May; 43(4):647-58. PubMed ID: 25388520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Intensifying the intensity illusion in judgments of learning: Modality and cue combinations.
    Peynircioğlu ZF; Tatz JR
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Apr; 47(3):412-419. PubMed ID: 30411221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.