These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11550747)

  • 21. Generation enhances semantic processing? The role of distinctiveness in the generation effect.
    Kinoshita S
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):563-71. PubMed ID: 2796741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of study time distribution on learning and retention: a Goldilocks principle for presentation rate.
    de Jonge M; Tabbers HK; Pecher D; Zeelenberg R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):405-12. PubMed ID: 22004269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of inhibitory processes in part-list cuing.
    Aslan A; Bäuml KH; Grundgeiger T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):335-41. PubMed ID: 17352615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The retrieval of controlled and automatic aspects of meaning on direct and indirect tests.
    Nelson DL; Schreiber TA; Holley PE
    Mem Cognit; 1992 Nov; 20(6):671-84. PubMed ID: 1435270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Item-specific effects in recognition failure: reasons for rejection of the Tulving-Wiseman function.
    Lian A; Glass AL; Raanaas RK
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):692-707. PubMed ID: 9701962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Priming in a free association task as a function of association directionality.
    Zeelenberg R; Shiffrin RM; Raaijmakers JG
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Nov; 27(6):956-61. PubMed ID: 10586572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implicit processing in the cued recall of young and old adults.
    McEvoy CL; Nelson DL; Holley PE; Stelnicki GS
    Psychol Aging; 1992 Sep; 7(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 1388861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Two routes for activation in the priming of categorical coordinates.
    Ray S; Bly BM
    J Gen Psychol; 2008 Jan; 135(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 18318409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Retrieval processes in recognition and cued recall.
    Nobel PA; Shiffrin RM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2001 Mar; 27(2):384-413. PubMed ID: 11294440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Automatic and directed search processes in solving simple semantic-memory problems.
    Ben-Zur H
    Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 2796746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. No retrieval-induced forgetting using item-specific independent cues: evidence against a general inhibitory account.
    Camp G; Pecher D; Schmidt HG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):950-8. PubMed ID: 17723071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Recognition failures and free-recall failures: implications for the relation between recall and recognition.
    Gardiner JM
    Mem Cognit; 1988 Sep; 16(5):446-51. PubMed ID: 3173093
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The moderating effects of stimulus valence and arousal on memory suppression.
    Marx BP; Marshall PJ; Castro F
    Emotion; 2008 Apr; 8(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 18410194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The generation effect and the modeling of associations in memory.
    Clark SE
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jul; 23(4):442-55. PubMed ID: 7666757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Strong cues are not necessarily weak: Thomson and Tulving (1970) and the encoding specificity principle revisited.
    Higham PA
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jan; 30(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 11958356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dissociative affective and associative priming effects in the lexical decision task: yes versus no responses to word targets reveal evaluative judgment tendencies.
    Wentura D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Mar; 26(2):456-69. PubMed ID: 10764106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implicit associative responses influence encoding in memory.
    Bryant DJ
    Mem Cognit; 1990 Jul; 18(4):348-58. PubMed ID: 2381314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Associations compete directly in memory.
    Caplan JB; Rehani M; Andrews JC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014 May; 67(5):955-78. PubMed ID: 24131316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Adaptive memory: animacy effects persist in paired-associate learning.
    VanArsdall JE; Nairne JS; Pandeirada JN; Cogdill M
    Memory; 2015; 23(5):657-63. PubMed ID: 24813366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The systematic use of semantic and acoustic processing by younger and older adults.
    West RL; Cohen SL
    Exp Aging Res; 1985; 11(2):81-6. PubMed ID: 4092721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.