These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11550918)

  • 21. A bayesian approach to the multistate Jolly-Seber capture-recapture model.
    Dupuis JA; Schwarz CJ
    Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1015-22. PubMed ID: 17501941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Open capture-recapture models with heterogeneity: II. Jolly-Seber model.
    Pledger S; Pollock KH; Norris JL
    Biometrics; 2010 Sep; 66(3):883-90. PubMed ID: 19930186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Glossary of terms relating to capture-recapture methods.
    Millar T; Domingo-Salvany A; Eastwood C; Hay G
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2008 Aug; 62(8):677-81. PubMed ID: 18621951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. On the design of closed recapture experiments.
    Alunni Fegatelli D; Farcomeni A
    Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1273-1294. PubMed ID: 27336415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimating population size for capture-recapture data when capture probabilities vary by time and individual animal.
    Chao A; Lee SM; Jeng SL
    Biometrics; 1992 Mar; 48(1):201-16. PubMed ID: 1581485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Jolly-Seber model with tag loss.
    Cowen L; Schwarz CJ
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):699-705. PubMed ID: 16984310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semiparametric estimation of animal abundance using capture-recapture data from open populations.
    Huggins R
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):684-90. PubMed ID: 16984308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Capture-recapture methodology: an option for surveillance of non-communicable diseases in the elderly].
    Coeli CM; Veras RP; da Silva Freire Coutinho E
    Cad Saude Publica; 2000; 16(4):1071-82. PubMed ID: 11175530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The use of mixed logit models to reflect heterogeneity in capture-recapture studies.
    Coull BA; Agresti A
    Biometrics; 1999 Mar; 55(1):294-301. PubMed ID: 11318172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Simple capture-recapture models permitting unequal catchability and variable sampling effort.
    Agresti A
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):494-500. PubMed ID: 8068848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Roaming through methodology. XXX. The capture-recapture method].
    van der Heijden PG; Hirasing RA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jan; 145(4):161-3. PubMed ID: 11213559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A general theory for modeling capture-recapture data from a closed population.
    Evans MA; Bonett DG; McDonald LL
    Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):396-405. PubMed ID: 8068840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A likelihood-based approach to capture-recapture estimation of demographic parameters under the robust design.
    Kendall WL; Pollock KH; Brownie C
    Biometrics; 1995 Mar; 51(1):293-308. PubMed ID: 7766783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing capture-recapture methods for estimation of the size of small and medium-sized populations using empirical data on commercial turkey farms in Canada.
    El Allaki F; Christensen J; Vallières A
    Prev Vet Med; 2015 Jun; 120(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 25542525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Capture-recapture and multiple-record systems estimation II: Applications in human diseases. International Working Group for Disease Monitoring and Forecasting.
    Am J Epidemiol; 1995 Nov; 142(10):1059-68. PubMed ID: 7485051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Flexible behavioral capture-recapture modeling.
    Alunni Fegatelli D; Tardella L
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):125-35. PubMed ID: 26444297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Importance of accounting for detection heterogeneity when estimating abundance: the case of French wolves.
    Cubaynes S; Pradel R; Choquet R; Duchamp C; Gaillard JM; Lebreton JD; Marboutin E; Miquel C; Reboulet AM; Poillot C; Taberlet P; Gimenez O
    Conserv Biol; 2010 Apr; 24(2):621-6. PubMed ID: 20105205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A unified likelihood-based approach for estimating population size in continuous-time capture-recapture experiments with frailty.
    Xi L; Yip PS; Watson R
    Biometrics; 2007 Mar; 63(1):228-36. PubMed ID: 17447949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nonidentifiability of population size from capture-recapture data with heterogeneous detection probabilities.
    Link WA
    Biometrics; 2003 Dec; 59(4):1123-30. PubMed ID: 14969493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimating population size and duplication rates when records cannot be linked.
    Laska EM; Meisner M; Wanderling J; Siegel C
    Stat Med; 2003 Nov; 22(21):3403-17. PubMed ID: 14566923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.