These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11550950)

  • 21. An efficient class of estimators for finite population mean in the presence of non-response under ranked set sampling (RSS).
    Rehman SA; Shabbir J
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0277232. PubMed ID: 36525461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitive proportion in ranked set sampling.
    Abbasi AM; Shad MY
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(8):e0256699. PubMed ID: 34464414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Information Generating Function of Ranked Set Samples.
    Kharazmi O; Tamandi M; Balakrishnan N
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Oct; 23(11):. PubMed ID: 34828079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved nonparametric estimation of the optimal diagnostic cut-off point associated with the Youden index under different sampling schemes.
    Yin J; Samawi H; Linder D
    Biom J; 2016 Jul; 58(4):915-34. PubMed ID: 26756282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of a decreasing mean residual life based on ranked set sampling with an application to survival analysis.
    Zamanzade E; Zamanzade E; Parvardeh A
    Int J Biostat; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38551082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Line transect sampling in small regions.
    Melville GJ; Welsh AH
    Biometrics; 2001 Dec; 57(4):1130-7. PubMed ID: 11764253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Estimation of population variance under ranked set sampling method by using the ratio of supplementary information with study variable.
    Alam R; Hanif M; Shahbaz SH; Shahbaz MQ
    Sci Rep; 2022 Dec; 12(1):21203. PubMed ID: 36481847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Line transect sampling in small and large regions.
    Fewster RM; Laake JL; Buckland ST
    Biometrics; 2005 Sep; 61(3):856-9; discussion 859-61. PubMed ID: 16135038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A covariance estimator for GEE with improved small-sample properties.
    Mancl LA; DeRouen TA
    Biometrics; 2001 Mar; 57(1):126-34. PubMed ID: 11252587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Selection of sentinel sites for death surveillance, using cluster or unequal probability sampling].
    Lian HL; Xu YY; Guo LX; Tan ZJ; Liu DH; Rao KQ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Apr; 31(4):459-61. PubMed ID: 20513297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Estimation of ordinal population with multi-observer ranked set samples using ties information.
    Alvandi A; Hatefi A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2021 Aug; 30(8):1960-1975. PubMed ID: 34218747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Isotonized CDF estimation from judgment poststratification data with empty strata.
    Wang X; Wang K; Lim J
    Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):194-202. PubMed ID: 21838805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Detectability in conventional and adaptive sampling.
    Thompson SK; Seber GA
    Biometrics; 1994 Sep; 50(3):712-24. PubMed ID: 7981397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Bias-corrected maximum likelihood estimator of the negative binomial dispersion parameter.
    Saha K; Paul S
    Biometrics; 2005 Mar; 61(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 15737091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. New robust statistical procedures for the polytomous logistic regression models.
    Castilla E; Ghosh A; Martin N; Pardo L
    Biometrics; 2018 Dec; 74(4):1282-1291. PubMed ID: 29772052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Estimation methods in a sampling survey].
    Warszawski J; Lellouch J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1997 Apr; 45(2):150-68. PubMed ID: 9221444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Stationarity tests for spatial point processes using discrepancies.
    Chiu SN; Liu KI
    Biometrics; 2013 Jun; 69(2):497-507. PubMed ID: 23724901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Five interval estimators for proportion ratio under a stratified randomized clinical trial with noncompliance.
    Lui KJ; Chang KC
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):613-26. PubMed ID: 17634977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Closed-form variance estimator for weighted propensity score estimators with survival outcome.
    Hajage D; Chauvet G; Belin L; Lafourcade A; Tubach F; De Rycke Y
    Biom J; 2018 Nov; 60(6):1151-1163. PubMed ID: 30257058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Inverse adaptive cluster sampling.
    Christman MC; Lan F
    Biometrics; 2001 Dec; 57(4):1096-105. PubMed ID: 11764249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.