These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11551006)

  • 21. Spectrophotometric evaluation of the optical influence of core build-up composites on all-ceramic materials.
    Li Q; Yu H; Wang YN
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):158-65. PubMed ID: 18606444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Color differences and color changes in Vita Shade tooth-colored restorative materials.
    Ikeda T; Nakanishi A; Yamamoto T; Sano H
    Am J Dent; 2003 Dec; 16(6):381-4. PubMed ID: 15002951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Shade distribution of commercial resin composites and color difference with shade guide tabs.
    Park SK; Lee YK
    Am J Dent; 2007 Oct; 20(5):335-9. PubMed ID: 17993033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Use of a common shade guide to test the perception of differences in the shades and value by members of the dental team.
    Geary JL; Kinirons MJ
    Prim Dent Care; 1999 Jul; 6(3):107-10. PubMed ID: 11819873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Curing depth of different shades of a photo-activated prosthetic composite material.
    Tanoue N; Koishi Y; Matsumura H; Atsuta M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jul; 28(7):618-23. PubMed ID: 11422692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Performance assessment of dental shade guides.
    Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e15-20. PubMed ID: 19329240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Evaluating the ability of dental technician students and graduate dentists to match tooth color.
    Sinmazisik G; Trakyali G; Tarcin B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1559-66. PubMed ID: 25134993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Performance of five commercially available tooth color-measuring devices.
    Dozić A; Kleverlaan CJ; El-Zohairy A; Feilzer AJ; Khashayar G
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 17362418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Visual and instrumental agreement in dental shade selection: three distinct observer populations and shade matching protocols.
    Della Bona A; Barrett AA; Rosa V; Pinzetta C
    Dent Mater; 2009 Feb; 25(2):276-81. PubMed ID: 19019420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of a newly developed visual shade-matching apparatus.
    Paravina RD
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):528-34. PubMed ID: 12475156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of shade tab arrangement on the repeatability and accuracy of shade selection.
    Yılmaz B; Yuzugullu B; Cınar D; Berksun S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Jun; 105(6):383-6. PubMed ID: 21640239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of shade matching by visual observation and an intraoral dental colorimeter.
    Li Q; Wang YN
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Nov; 34(11):848-54. PubMed ID: 17919252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical study to compare two in-office (chairside) whitening systems.
    Gallagher A; Maggio B; Bowman J; Borden L; Mason S; Felix H
    J Clin Dent; 2002; 13(6):219-24. PubMed ID: 12518494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The repeatability of an intraoral dental colorimeter.
    Tung FF; Goldstein GR; Jang S; Hittelman E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):585-90. PubMed ID: 12488850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Conventional visual vs spectrophotometric shade taking for porcelain-fused-to-metal crowns: a clinical comparison.
    Paul SJ; Peter A; Rodoni L; Pietrobon N
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2004 Jun; 24(3):222-31. PubMed ID: 15227770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Does gender and experience influence shade matching quality?
    Haddad HJ; Jakstat HA; Arnetzl G; Borbely J; Vichi A; Dumfahrt H; Renault P; Corcodel N; Pohlen B; Marada G; de Parga JA; Reshad M; Klinke TU; Hannak WB; Paravina RD
    J Dent; 2009; 37 Suppl 1():e40-4. PubMed ID: 19520478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical effect of different shade guide systems on the tooth shades of ceramic-veneered restorations.
    Hassel AJ; Koke U; Schmitter M; Beck J; Rammelsberg P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(5):422-6. PubMed ID: 16220809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Subjective evaluation of the effect of porcelain opacity on the resultant color of porcelain veneers.
    Davis BK; Aquilino SA; Lund PS; Diaz-Arnold AM; Denehy GE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1990; 3(6):567-72. PubMed ID: 2083025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Shade matching assisted by digital photography and computer software.
    Schropp L
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 19141046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Color distribution of a shade guide in the value, chroma, and hue scale.
    Ahn JS; Lee YK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Jul; 100(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 18589070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.