These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1823 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11552166)

  • 1. Influence of shade and storage time on the flexural strength, flexural modulus, and hardness of composites used for indirect restorations.
    Cesar PF; Miranda WG; Braga RR
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):289-96. PubMed ID: 11552166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of fiber type and wetting agent on the flexural properties of an indirect fiber reinforced composite.
    Ellakwa AE; Shortall AC; Marquis PM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Nov; 88(5):485-90. PubMed ID: 12473997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Influence of veneering composite composition on the efficacy of fiber-reinforced restorations (FRR).
    Ellakwa A; Shortall A; Shehata M; Marquis P
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 11551011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of shear and flexural bond strength tests versus failure modes of dentin bonding systems.
    Dunn WJ; Söderholm KJ
    Am J Dent; 2001 Oct; 14(5):297-303. PubMed ID: 11803994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of different surface treatments on the repair bond strength of indirect composites.
    Souza EM; Francischone CE; Powers JM; Rached RN; Vieira S
    Am J Dent; 2008 Apr; 21(2):93-6. PubMed ID: 18578175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Strength and elastic modulus of fiber-reinforced composites used for fabricating FPDs.
    Nakamura T; Waki T; Kinuta S; Tanaka H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):549-53. PubMed ID: 14651244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Changes in flexural properties of composite restoratives after aging in water.
    Yap AU; Chandra SP; Chung SM; Lim CT
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):468-74. PubMed ID: 12216565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of the wear resistance and hardness of indirect composite resins.
    Mandikos MN; McGivney GP; Davis E; Bush PJ; Carter JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Apr; 85(4):386-95. PubMed ID: 11319537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of food-simulating liquids on the flexural strength of composite and polyacid-modified composite restoratives.
    Yap AU; Tan DT; Goh BK; Kuah HG; Goh M
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 11203817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The flexural properties of fiber-reinforced composite with light-polymerized polymer matrix.
    Bae JM; Kim KN; Hattori M; Hasegawa K; Yoshinari M; Kawada E; Oda Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(1):33-9. PubMed ID: 11842902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory strength of glass ionomer cement, compomers, and resin composites.
    Piwowarczyk A; Ottl P; Lauer HC; Büchler A
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):86-91. PubMed ID: 12087545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bonding indirect resin composites to metal: Part 1. Comparison of shear bond strengths between different metal-resin bonding systems and a metal-ceramic system.
    Petridis H; Garefis P; Hirayama H; Kafantaris NM; Koidis PT
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(6):635-9. PubMed ID: 14714844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of cross-sectional design on the modulus of elasticity and toughness of fiber-reinforced composite materials.
    Dyer SR; Lassila LV; Jokinen M; Vallittu PK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):219-26. PubMed ID: 16126074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Flexural properties of endodontic posts and human root dentin.
    Plotino G; Grande NM; Bedini R; Pameijer CH; Somma F
    Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1129-35. PubMed ID: 17116326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of mechanical properties of resin composites on the efficacy of the dentin bonding system.
    Hasegawa T; Itoh K; Koike T; Yukitani W; Hisamitsu H; Wakumoto S; Fujishima A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(6):323-30. PubMed ID: 10823080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the flexural strength of five adhesive resin cements.
    Pace LL; Hummel SK; Marker VA; Bolouri A
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17244303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bis-(acrylamide)s as new cross-linkers for resin-based composite restoratives.
    Moszner N; Fischer UK; Angermann J; Rheinberger V
    Dent Mater; 2006 Dec; 22(12):1157-62. PubMed ID: 16386292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of some properties of two fiber-reinforced composite materials.
    Lassila LV; Tezvergil A; Lahdenperä M; Alander P; Shinya A; Shinya A; Vallittu PK
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Aug; 63(4):196-204. PubMed ID: 16040441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of micro-tensile bond strengths of composite materials in comparison to their polymerization shrinkage.
    Ilie N; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jul; 22(7):593-601. PubMed ID: 16289723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of glass fiber layering on the flexural strength of microfill and hybrid composites.
    Eronat N; Candan U; Türkün M
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2009; 21(3):171-8; discussion 179-81. PubMed ID: 19508260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 92.