These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11552168)

  • 1. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
    Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retention strengths of five luting cements on prefabricated dowels after root canal obturation with a zinc oxide/eugenol sealer: 1. Dowel space preparation/cementation at one week after obturation.
    Hagge MS; Wong RD; Lindemuth JS
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):168-75. PubMed ID: 12237797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of surface treatment of titanium posts on the tensile bond strength.
    Schmage P; Sohn J; Ozcan M; Nergiz I
    Dent Mater; 2006 Feb; 22(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 16039707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The retentive effects of pre-fabricated posts by luting cements.
    Sen D; Poyrazoglu E; Tuncelli B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):585-9. PubMed ID: 15189317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of titanium dowel retention using four different luting agents.
    Balbosh A; Ludwig K; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Sep; 94(3):227-33. PubMed ID: 16126075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Torsional resistance of crowns cemented to composite cores involving three stainless steel endodontic post designs.
    Cohen BI; Penugonda B; Pagnillo MK; Schulman A; Hittelman E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 10898840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
    Balbosh A; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Retention of three endodontic posts cemented with five dental cements.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 May; 79(5):520-5. PubMed ID: 9597604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro evaluation of the retention of composite fiber and stainless steel posts.
    Gallo JR; Miller T; Xu X; Burgess JO
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Mar; 11(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 11935507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The effect of different fabrication methods and luting cements on post retention].
    Ma HM; Li ZC; Li H; Chen X
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2004 Apr; 22(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 15190802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts.
    Newman MP; Yaman P; Dennison J; Rafter M; Billy E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Apr; 89(4):360-7. PubMed ID: 12690348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of endodontic post surface treatment, dentin conditioning, and artificial aging on the retention of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts.
    Albashaireh ZS; Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Jan; 103(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 20105680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two luting agents used for the retention of cast dowel and cores.
    Habib B; von Fraunhofer JA; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Sep; 14(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 16336233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of resin cement film thickness on the pullout strength of a fiber-reinforced post system.
    D'Arcangelo C; Cinelli M; De Angelis F; D'Amario M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Sep; 98(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 17854620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fatigue resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three dowel-and-core systems.
    Goto Y; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Junge T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 15623997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of EDTA conditioning upon the retention of fibre posts luted with resin cements.
    Rasimick BJ; Shah RP; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1101-6. PubMed ID: 19133100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retention and failure morphology of prefabricated posts.
    Sahafi A; Peutzfeldt A; Asmussen E; Gotfredsen K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):307-12. PubMed ID: 15237877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of prefabricated and individually cast root canal posts in vitro.
    Hedlund SO; Johansson NG; Sjögren G
    Br Dent J; 2003 Aug; 195(3):155-8; discussion 147. PubMed ID: 12907984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.