512 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11554390)
1. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: Detriment versus hormesis. Part 2. Dose responses of organisms.
Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 42(9):26N-32N, 37N. PubMed ID: 11554390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: detriment versus hormesis. Part 1. Dose responses of cells and tissues.
Feinendegen LE; Pollycove M
J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 42(7):17N-27N. PubMed ID: 11441881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: adaptive response versus bystander effect.
Adelstein SJ
J Nucl Med; 2003 Jan; 44(1):125; author reply 125-6. PubMed ID: 12515886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Epidemiology. Radiation dangerous even at lowest doses.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5732):233. PubMed ID: 16002592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Two principal considerations are needed after low doses of ionizing radiation.
Feinendegen LE; Paretzke H; Neumann RD
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 18220467
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Carcinogenic effects of low-level ionizing radiation: problems and prospects.
Upton AC
In Vivo; 2002; 16(6):527-33. PubMed ID: 12494897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The effect of low doses of ionizing radiation on living organisms with special emphasis on evaluating the risk of these doses].
Kraljević P
Lijec Vjesn; 1988; 110(1-2):34-7. PubMed ID: 3283485
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Hormesis. A healthful dab of radiation?
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Oct; 302(5644):378. PubMed ID: 14563982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptation to ionizing radiation induced by prior exposure to very low doses.
Wolff S
Chin Med J (Engl); 1994 Jun; 107(6):425-30. PubMed ID: 7956481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biological effects of low level exposures to ionizing radiation: theory and practice.
Liu SZ
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(4):275-81. PubMed ID: 20332172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Low-dose radiation exposure and carcinogenesis.
Suzuki K; Yamashita S
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Jul; 42(7):563-8. PubMed ID: 22641644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Common sense about the linear no-threshold controversy-give the general public a break.
Leonard BE
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245-6; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220465
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Economic and policy considerations drive the LNT debate.
Mossman KL
Radiat Res; 2008 Feb; 169(2):245; author reply 246-7. PubMed ID: 18220464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The meaning of low dose and low dose-rate.
Wakeford R; Tawn EJ
J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20234068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Whole-body responses to low-level radiation exposure: new concepts in mammalian radiobiology.
Feinendegen LE; Pollycove M; Neumann RD
Exp Hematol; 2007 Apr; 35(4 Suppl 1):37-46. PubMed ID: 17379086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low-dose radioimmuno-therapy of cancer.
Pollycove M; Feinendegen LE
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 18480144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation hormesis--a remedy for fear.
Jaworowski Z
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 20332170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physics must join with biology in better assessing risk from low-dose irradiation.
Feinendegen LE; Neumann RD
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(4):346-56. PubMed ID: 16244096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Review of relative biological effectiveness dependence on linear energy transfer for low-LET radiations.
Hunter N; Muirhead CR
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Mar; 29(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 19225189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The RBE of low-LET radiations.
Chadwick KH; Leenhouts HP
J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):445-47; author reply 447-9. PubMed ID: 19696460
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
