252 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11554522)
1. Age-related differences in object- and location-based inhibition of return of attention.
McCrae CS; Abrams RA
Psychol Aging; 2001 Sep; 16(3):437-49. PubMed ID: 11554522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Object- and location-based inhibition of return in younger and older adults.
McAuliffe J; Chasteen AL; Pratt J
Psychol Aging; 2006 Jun; 21(2):406-10. PubMed ID: 16768585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Examining inhibition of return with multiple sequential cues in younger and older adults.
Pratt J; Chasteen AL
Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):404-9. PubMed ID: 17563197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural correlates of spatial and non-spatial inhibition of return (IOR) in attentional orienting.
Zhou X; Chen Q
Neuropsychologia; 2008 Sep; 46(11):2766-75. PubMed ID: 18597795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential age effects on attention-based inhibition: inhibitory tagging and inhibition of return.
Langley LK; Vivas AB; Fuentes LJ; Bagne AG
Psychol Aging; 2005 Jun; 20(2):356-60. PubMed ID: 16029098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Inhibition of return in aging and Alzheimer's disease: performance as a function of task demands and stimulus timing.
Langley LK; Fuentes LJ; Hochhalter AK; Brandt J; Overmier JB
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2001 Aug; 23(4):431-46. PubMed ID: 11780944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cortical expressions of inhibition of return.
Prime DJ; Ward LM
Brain Res; 2006 Feb; 1072(1):161-74. PubMed ID: 16445889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Inhibition of return to an occluded object depends on expectation.
Jefferies LN; Wright RD; Di Lollo V
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2005 Dec; 31(6):1224-33. PubMed ID: 16366785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effects of age and task demands on visual selective attention.
McLaughlin PM; Szostak C; Binns MA; Craik FI; Tipper SP; Stuss DT
Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Sep; 64(3):197-207. PubMed ID: 20873916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inhibition of return generated by voluntary saccades is independent of attentional momentum.
Machado L; Rafal R
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Jul; 57(5):789-96. PubMed ID: 15204117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Saccade trajectory deviations and inhibition-of-return: Measuring the amount of attentional processing.
Theeuwes J; Van der Stigchel S
Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1307-15. PubMed ID: 18723045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Aging and inhibition: beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention.
Kramer AF; Humphrey DG; Larish JF; Logan GD; Strayer DL
Psychol Aging; 1994 Dec; 9(4):491-512. PubMed ID: 7893421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of spatial distribution of attention during inhibition of return (IOR) on flanker interference in hearing and congenitally deaf people.
Chen Q; Zhang M; Zhou X
Brain Res; 2006 Sep; 1109(1):117-27. PubMed ID: 16859649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. There's little return for attentional momentum.
Snyder JJ; Schmidt WC; Kingstone A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1726-37. PubMed ID: 19968431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of age-related changes in inhibition and binding using eye movement monitoring.
Ryan JD; Leung G; Turk-Browne NB; Hasher L
Psychol Aging; 2007 Jun; 22(2):239-50. PubMed ID: 17563180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of endogenous and exogenous attention on visual processing: an Inhibition of Return study.
Chica AB; Lupiáñez J
Brain Res; 2009 Jun; 1278():75-85. PubMed ID: 19374885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Endogenous saccade preparation does not produce inhibition of return: failure to replicate Rafal, Calabresi, Brennan, & Sciolto (1989).
Chica AB; Klein RM; Rafal RD; Hopfinger JB
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Oct; 36(5):1193-206. PubMed ID: 20731522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of age on inhibition of return is independent of non-ocular response inhibition.
Poliakoff E; Coward RS; Lowe C; O'Boyle DJ
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):387-96. PubMed ID: 16884743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Two components in IOR: evidence for response bias and perceptual processing delays using the SAT methodology.
Zhao Y; Heinke D; Ivanoff J; Klein RM; Humphreys GW
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Oct; 73(7):2143-59. PubMed ID: 21789695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Inhibition of return in subliminal letter priming.
Marzouki Y; Grainger J; Theeuwes J
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Sep; 129(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 18582840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
