128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11554645)
1. Being better by being right: subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined.
Marques JM; Abrams D; Serĵdio RG
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Sep; 81(3):436-47. PubMed ID: 11554645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pronorm and antinorm deviants: a test of the subjective group dynamics model.
Hichy Z; Mari S; Capozza D
J Soc Psychol; 2008 Oct; 148(5):641-4. PubMed ID: 18958982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Membership status and subjective group dynamics: who triggers the black sheep effect?
Pinto IR; Marques JM; Levine JM; Abrams D
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Jul; 99(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 20565188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Distinguishing between silent and vocal minorities: not all deviants feel marginal.
Morrison KR; Miller DT
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 May; 94(5):871-82. PubMed ID: 18444744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Collective deviance: Scaling up subjective group dynamics to superordinate categories reveals a deviant ingroup protection effect.
Abrams D; Travaglino GA; Marques JM; Davies B; Randsley de Moura G
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2022 Aug; 123(2):353-372. PubMed ID: 33475399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The development of subjective group dynamics: children's judgments of normative and deviant in-group and out-group individuals.
Abrams D; Rutland A; Cameron L
Child Dev; 2003; 74(6):1840-56. PubMed ID: 14669899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluations of and reasoning about normative and deviant ingroup and outgroup members: development of the black sheep effect.
Abrams D; Palmer SB; Rutland A; Cameron L; Van de Vyver J
Dev Psychol; 2014 Jan; 50(1):258-70. PubMed ID: 23544855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Black sheep effect and ingroup favoritism in social identity perspective].
Oishi C; Yoshida F
Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2002 Dec; 73(5):405-11. PubMed ID: 12625238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reactions to intragroup deviance: does disidentification have a role?
Cameira M; Ribeiro TA
J Soc Psychol; 2014; 154(3):233-50. PubMed ID: 24873026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The bad apple effect and social value orientation in public-goods dilemmas: replication and extension of research findings.
Wu S; Sun J; Cai W; Jin S
Psychol Rep; 2014 Jun; 114(3):866-79. PubMed ID: 25074307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intergroup conflict, out-group derogation, and self-directed negative affect among Italian South Tyroleans.
Costarelli S; Colloca P
J Soc Psychol; 2004 Apr; 144(2):181-9. PubMed ID: 15074505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Energizing and de-motivating effects of norm-conflict.
McDonald RI; Fielding KS; Louis WR
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Jan; 39(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 23100542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Loyal deviance: testing the normative conflict model of dissent in social groups.
Packer DJ; Chasteen AL
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jan; 36(1):5-18. PubMed ID: 19907038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Social groups and children's intergroup attitudes: can school norms moderate the effects of social group norms?
Nesdale D; Lawson MJ
Child Dev; 2011; 82(5):1594-606. PubMed ID: 21883158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Individuality and group formation: the role of independence and differentiation.
Kampmeier C; Simon B
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2001 Sep; 81(3):448-62. PubMed ID: 11554646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization.
Abrams D; Wetherell M; Cochrane S; Hogg MA; Turner JC
Br J Soc Psychol; 1990 Jun; 29 ( Pt 2)():97-119. PubMed ID: 2372667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Older but wilier: In-group accountability and the development of subjective group dynamics.
Abrams D; Rutland A; Cameron L; Ferrell J
Dev Psychol; 2007 Jan; 43(1):134-48. PubMed ID: 17201514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uncertainty and the influence of group norms in the attitude-behaviour relationship.
Smith JR; Hogg MA; Martin R; Terry DJ
Br J Soc Psychol; 2007 Dec; 46(Pt 4):769-92. PubMed ID: 18062848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Personal and general belief in a just world as judgement norms.
Alves H; Correia I
Int J Psychol; 2010 Jun; 45(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 22043935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pro-norm and anti-norm deviance within and between groups.
Abrams D; Marques JM; Bown N; Henson M
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2000 May; 78(5):906-12. PubMed ID: 10821197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
