BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11555485)

  • 1. Sweetener preference of C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.
    Bachmanov AA; Tordoff MG; Beauchamp GK
    Chem Senses; 2001 Sep; 26(7):905-13. PubMed ID: 11555485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Whole nerve chorda tympani responses to sweeteners in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.
    Inoue M; McCaughey SA; Bachmanov AA; Beauchamp GK
    Chem Senses; 2001 Sep; 26(7):915-23. PubMed ID: 11555486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Taste-evoked responses to sweeteners in the nucleus of the solitary tract differ between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.
    McCaughey SA
    J Neurosci; 2007 Jan; 27(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 17202470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fat and sugar flavor preference and acceptance in C57BL/6J and 129 mice: experience attenuates strain differences.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2007 Mar; 90(4):602-11. PubMed ID: 17210165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects behavioral and neural taste responses to sweeteners in the F2 hybrids between C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.
    Inoue M; Reed DR; Li X; Tordoff MG; Beauchamp GK; Bachmanov AA
    J Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 24(9):2296-303. PubMed ID: 14999080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Amino acid and carbohydrate preferences in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.
    Bachmanov AA; Beauchamp GK
    Physiol Behav; 2008 Jan; 93(1-2):37-43. PubMed ID: 17764708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhanced sucrose and Polycose preference in sweet "sensitive" (C57BL/6J) and "subsensitive" (129P3/J) mice after experience with these saccharides.
    Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Apr; 87(4):745-56. PubMed ID: 16529783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Advantame sweetener preference in C57BL/6J mice and Sprague-Dawley rats.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Chem Senses; 2015 Mar; 40(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 25560795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Flavor preferences conditioned by nutritive and non-nutritive sweeteners in mice.
    Sclafani A; Ackroff K
    Physiol Behav; 2017 May; 173():188-199. PubMed ID: 28192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is glycine "sweet" to mice? Mouse strain differences in perception of glycine taste.
    Manita S; Bachmanov AA; Li X; Beauchamp GK; Inoue M
    Chem Senses; 2006 Nov; 31(9):785-93. PubMed ID: 16901953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intake of umami-tasting solutions by mice: a genetic analysis.
    Bachmanov AA; Tordoff MG; Beauchamp GK
    J Nutr; 2000 Apr; 130(4S Suppl):935S-41S. PubMed ID: 10736356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Allelic variation of the Tas1r3 taste receptor gene selectively affects taste responses to sweeteners: evidence from 129.B6-Tas1r3 congenic mice.
    Inoue M; Glendinning JI; Theodorides ML; Harkness S; Li X; Bosak N; Beauchamp GK; Bachmanov AA
    Physiol Genomics; 2007 Dec; 32(1):82-94. PubMed ID: 17911381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Maltodextrin and sucrose preferences in sweet-sensitive (C57BL/6J) and subsensitive (129P3/J) mice revisited.
    Ackroff K; Sclafani A
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Oct; 165():286-90. PubMed ID: 27526998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Oral zinc sulfate solutions inhibit sweet taste perception.
    Keast RS; Canty TM; Breslin PA
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jul; 29(6):513-21. PubMed ID: 15269123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
    Kraft TT; Huang D; Lolier M; Warshaw D; LaMagna S; Natanova E; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2016 Jan; 153():64-9. PubMed ID: 26485292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Taste perception of monosodium glutamate and inosine monophosphate by 129P3/J and C57BL/6ByJ mice.
    Murata Y; Beauchamp GK; Bachmanov AA
    Physiol Behav; 2009 Oct; 98(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 19666040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No detriment in taste response or expression in offspring of mice fed representative levels of sucrose or non-caloric sucralose while pregnant.
    Choo E; Dando R
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Feb; 184():39-45. PubMed ID: 29108962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Female rats show a bimodal preference response to the artificial sweetener sucralose.
    Sclafani A; Clare RA
    Chem Senses; 2004 Jul; 29(6):523-8. PubMed ID: 15269124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experience with sugar modifies behavioral but not taste-evoked medullary responses to sweeteners in mice.
    McCaughey SA; Glendinning JI
    Chem Senses; 2013 Nov; 38(9):793-802. PubMed ID: 24084168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential fructose and glucose appetition in DBA/2, 129P3 and C57BL/6 × 129P3 hybrid mice revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.
    Nashed M; Castillo A; Roland M; Carata I; Berglas E; Pines R; Riaz S; Morisset BJ; Sclafani A; Bodnar RJ
    Physiol Behav; 2021 Nov; 241():113590. PubMed ID: 34509472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.