These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11556445)

  • 1. Effectiveness and cost effectiveness of automated and semi-automated cervical screening devices: a systematic review of the literature.
    Broadstock M
    N Z Med J; 2001 Jul; 114(1135):311-3. PubMed ID: 11556445
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of automated technology on the cervical cytologic smear. A comparison of cost.
    Grohs DH
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):165-70. PubMed ID: 9479335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automated rescreening in cervical cytology. Mathematical models for evaluating overall process sensitivity, specificity and cost.
    Kaminsky FC; Benneyan JC; Mullins DL
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):209-23. PubMed ID: 9022745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Cervical smears. Contribution of automated screening].
    Ziol M; Vacher-Lavenu MC
    Ann Pathol; 1996 Nov; 16(5):351-5. PubMed ID: 9004722
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Advances in cervical screening technology.
    Stoler MH
    Mod Pathol; 2000 Mar; 13(3):275-84. PubMed ID: 10757338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stanley F. Patten, Jr., M.D., Ph.D. and the development of an automated Papanicolaou smear screening system.
    Lee JS; Nelson AC
    Cancer; 1997 Dec; 81(6):332-6. PubMed ID: 9438457
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Increased cervical cytologic smear access through increased capacity.
    Shaver JL
    J Reprod Med; 1998 Nov; 43(11):1005-6. PubMed ID: 9839272
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost effectiveness in new technology in cervix cancer screening.
    Sedlacek TV
    Epidemiology; 2002 May; 13 Suppl 3():S26-9. PubMed ID: 12071480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Introduction to and update of "cost effectiveness in new technology in cervix cancer screening".
    Robinowitz M
    Epidemiology; 2002 May; 13 Suppl 3():S23-5. PubMed ID: 12071479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prospects for newer technologies in cervical cancer screening programmes.
    Hailey DM; Lea R
    J Qual Clin Pract; 1995 Sep; 15(3):139-45. PubMed ID: 8528539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing the costs and benefits of alternative rescreening strategies.
    Hutchinson ML
    Acta Cytol; 1996; 40(1):4-8. PubMed ID: 8604573
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospects for automated cytology.
    Richart RM; Patten SF; Lee JS
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1996 Dec; 23(4):853-9. PubMed ID: 8989778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. PAPNET Testing System. Technical update.
    Denaro TJ; Herriman JM; Shapira O
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 9022728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liquid-based cytology in cervical screening: a rapid and systematic review.
    Payne N; Chilcott J; McGoogan E
    Health Technol Assess; 2000; 4(18):1-73. PubMed ID: 10932023
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance in cervical cytology screening. Comparison of rapid rescreening and the PAPNET Testing System.
    Halford JA; Wright RG; Ditchmen EJ
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):79-81. PubMed ID: 9022730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. PAPNET for cervical cytology screening. Experience in Greece.
    Veneti S; Papaefthimiou M; Symiakaki H; Ioannidou-Mouzaka L
    Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9987447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Too early to solve Pap device puzzle.
    Check W
    CAP Today; 1997 Jun; 11(6):1, 44-6, 48-9 passim. PubMed ID: 10174227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Whatever happened to cervical cytology automation?
    Tucker J; Stenkvist B
    Anal Cell Pathol; 1990 Jul; 2(4):259-66. PubMed ID: 2275872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of the TracCell system in mapping Papanicolaou-stained cytologic material.
    Grohs DH; Dadeshidze VV; Domanik RA; Gombrich PP; Olsson LJ; Pressman NJ
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 9022737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.