These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11556803)

  • 1. Cancellous and cortical bone imaging by reflected tomography.
    Lasaygues P; Lefebvre JP
    Ultrason Imaging; 2001 Jan; 23(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 11556803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simultaneous estimation of cortical bone thickness and acoustic wave velocity using a multivariable optimization approach: Bone phantom and in-vitro study.
    Tasinkevych Y; Podhajecki J; Falińska K; Litniewski J
    Ultrasonics; 2016 Feb; 65():105-12. PubMed ID: 26522955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ultrasonic assessment of human and bovine trabecular bone: a comparison study.
    Alves JM; Xu W; Lin D; Siffert RS; Ryaby JT; Kaufman JJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1996 Mar; 43(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 8682537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Progress towards in vitro quantitative imaging of human femur using compound quantitative ultrasonic tomography.
    Lasaygues P; Ouedraogo E; Lefebvre JP; Gindre M; Talmant M; Laugier P
    Phys Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 50(11):2633-49. PubMed ID: 15901959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. High resolution low frequency ultrasonic tomography.
    Lasaygues P; Lefebvre JP; Mensah S
    Ultrason Imaging; 1997 Oct; 19(4):278-93. PubMed ID: 9651955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Signal of Interest Selection Standard for Ultrasonic Backscatter in Cancellous Bone Evaluation.
    Liu C; Tang T; Xu F; Ta D; Matsukawa M; Hu B; Wang W
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 41(10):2714-21. PubMed ID: 26210784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Influence of cancellous bone microstructure on two ultrasonic wave propagations in bovine femur: an in vitro study.
    Mizuno K; Somiya H; Kubo T; Matsukawa M; Otani T; Tsujimoto T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3181-9. PubMed ID: 21110613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ultrasonic wave propagation in bovine cancellous bone.
    Hosokawa A; Otani T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jan; 101(1):558-62. PubMed ID: 9000743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ultrasonic propagation in cancellous bone: a new stratified model.
    Hughes ER; Leighton TG; Petley GW; White PR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Jun; 25(5):811-21. PubMed ID: 10414898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultrasonic pulse waves in cancellous bone analyzed by finite-difference time-domain methods.
    Hosokawa A
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e227-31. PubMed ID: 16844171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-wave propagation imaging to evaluate the structure of cancellous bone.
    Yamashita K; Fujita F; Mizuno K; Mano I; Matsukawa M
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Jun; 59(6):1160-6. PubMed ID: 22711411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Frequency dependence of ultrasonic attenuation in bovine cortical bone: an in vitro study.
    Sasso M; Haïat G; Yamato Y; Naili S; Matsukawa M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1933-42. PubMed ID: 17681677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Ultrasonic wave propagation characteristics of cancellous bone].
    Otani T
    Clin Calcium; 2004 Dec; 14(12):69-75. PubMed ID: 15577177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a new ultrasonic technique for bone and biomaterials in vitro characterization.
    Lefebvre F; Deblock Y; Campistron P; Ahite D; Fabre JJ
    J Biomed Mater Res; 2002; 63(4):441-6. PubMed ID: 12115753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of bone structure on ultrasonic attenuation and velocity.
    Tavakoli MB; Evans JA
    Ultrasonics; 1992; 30(6):389-95. PubMed ID: 1440986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ultrasonic characterization of cancellous bone using apparent integrated backscatter.
    Hoffmeister BK; Jones CI; Caldwell GJ; Kaste SC
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 51(11):2715-27. PubMed ID: 16723761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of structural anisotropy of cancellous bone on speed of ultrasonic fast waves in the bovine femur.
    Mizuno K; Matsukawa M; Otani T; Takada M; Mano I; Tsujimoto T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Jul; 55(7):1480-7. PubMed ID: 18986937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Study for imaging of inside bone using FM-chirp pulse compression system.
    Irie T; Ohdaira E; Itoh K
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):713-6. PubMed ID: 15047372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast and velocity ultrasonic tomography of long bones.
    Ouedraogo E; Lasaygues P; Lefebvre JP; Gindre M; Talmant M; Laugier P
    Ultrason Imaging; 2002 Jul; 24(3):139-60. PubMed ID: 12508791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Full wave 3D inverse scattering transmission ultrasound tomography in the presence of high contrast.
    Wiskin J; Malik B; Borup D; Pirshafiey N; Klock J
    Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):20166. PubMed ID: 33214569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.