BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

437 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11557944)

  • 1. Peers under pressure.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):102-4. PubMed ID: 11557944
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
    Adam D; Knight J
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):772-6. PubMed ID: 12397323
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The politics of publication.
    Lawrence PA
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6929):259-61. PubMed ID: 12646895
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Journals should set a new standard in transparency.
    Dellavalle RP; Lundahl K; Freeman SR; Schilling LM
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7126):364. PubMed ID: 17251958
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retractions' realities.
    Nature; 2003 Mar; 422(6927):1. PubMed ID: 12621394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bad peer reviewers.
    Nature; 2001 Sep; 413(6852):93. PubMed ID: 11557930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Scientific publishing. Peer review and quality: a dubious connection?
    Enserink M
    Science; 2001 Sep; 293(5538):2187-8. PubMed ID: 11567115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Financial interests are not the only bias factor.
    Gori GB
    Nature; 2001 Oct; 413(6856):565. PubMed ID: 11595913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Additional statements from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
    CMAJ; 1995 May; 152(10):1647-55. PubMed ID: 7743450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Publication ethics.
    Hays JC
    Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Penalties plus high-quality review to fight plagiarism.
    Wittmaack K
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7047):24. PubMed ID: 16001039
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Publication ethics--responsibility of all].
    Staff A; Rørtveit G
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2010 Feb; 130(3):259. PubMed ID: 20160762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standards for ethical publication.
    Johnson JT; Niparko JK; Levine PA; Kennedy DW; Rudy SF; Weber P; Weber RS; Benninger MS; Rosenfeld RM; Ruben RJ; Smith RJ; Sataloff RT; Weir N
    Am J Otolaryngol; 2007; 28(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 17162121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three cheers for peers.
    Nature; 2006 Jan; 439(7073):118. PubMed ID: 16407911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication.
    International Committee of Medical Journal Editors
    Croat Med J; 2003 Dec; 44(6):770-83. PubMed ID: 14725274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A look inside the Pharos review process.
    Harris ED
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2003; 66(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 12838637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Confidentiality.
    Guenin LM
    Science; 1996 Mar; 271(5257):1790. PubMed ID: 8596940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review and scientific misconduct: bad authors and trusting reviewers.
    Malay DS
    J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(3):283-4. PubMed ID: 19423027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Knowledge on feet of clay].
    Dahlqvist R
    Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1405-6. PubMed ID: 18574980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [The journals must honestly tell who is doing the job].
    Bergström R
    Lakartidningen; 2008 May 7-13; 105(19):1406-7. PubMed ID: 18574981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 22.