These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11558807)
1. Frequency doubling technology and confocal scanning ophthalmoscopic optic disc analysis in open-angle glaucoma with hemifield defects. Wu LL; Suzuki Y; Kunimatsu S; Araie M; Iwase A; Tomita G J Glaucoma; 2001 Aug; 10(4):256-60. PubMed ID: 11558807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Frequency-doubling perimetry in examination of open-angle glaucoma with hemifield defect]. Wu L; Suzuki Y; Kunimatsu S; Araie M; Yao K Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Dec; 38(12):717-20. PubMed ID: 12654219 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Frequency doubling technology for earlier detection of functional damage in standard automated perimetry-normal hemifield in glaucoma with low-to-normal pressure. Nakagawa S; Murata H; Saito H; Nakahara H; Mataki N; Tomidokoro A; Iwase A; Araie M J Glaucoma; 2012 Jan; 21(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 21543995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical ability of Heidelberg retinal tomograph examination to detect glaucomatous visual field changes. Miglior S; Casula M; Guareschi M; Marchetti I; Iester M; Orzalesi N Ophthalmology; 2001 Sep; 108(9):1621-7. PubMed ID: 11535460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationship between Humphrey 30-2 SITA Standard Test, Matrix 30-2 threshold test, and Heidelberg retina tomograph in ocular hypertensive and glaucoma patients. Bozkurt B; Yilmaz PT; Irkec M J Glaucoma; 2008; 17(3):203-10. PubMed ID: 18414106 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups. Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Frequency doubling technology and scanning laser tomography in eyes with generalized enlargement of optic disc cupping. Kunimatsu S; Tomita G; Araie M; Aihara M; Suzuki Y; Iwase A; Koseki N; Matsumoto S; Yamazaki Y; Yoshikawa K J Glaucoma; 2005 Aug; 14(4):280-7. PubMed ID: 15990608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Association of optic disc configuration and clustered visual field sensitivity in glaucomatous eyes with hemifield visual field defects. Nagai-Kusuhara A; Nakamura M; Kanamori A; Negi A J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):62-8. PubMed ID: 19142137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Correlation between confocal tomography of the optic nerve (HRT) and the perimetric frequency doubling technology]. Sampaolesi R; Brusini P; Sampaolesi JR Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Nov; 220(11):754-66. PubMed ID: 14634902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Optic disc and visual field changes in a prospective longitudinal study of patients with glaucoma: comparison of scanning laser tomography with conventional perimetry and optic disc photography. Chauhan BC; McCormick TA; Nicolela MT; LeBlanc RP Arch Ophthalmol; 2001 Oct; 119(10):1492-9. PubMed ID: 11594950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detecting early to mild glaucomatous damage: a comparison of the multifocal VEP and automated perimetry. Hood DC; Thienprasiddhi P; Greenstein VC; Winn BJ; Ohri N; Liebmann JM; Ritch R Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Feb; 45(2):492-8. PubMed ID: 14744890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Identification of glaucoma-related visual field abnormality with the screening protocol of frequency doubling technology. Quigley HA Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):819-29. PubMed ID: 9645719 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Scanning laser polarimetry versus frequency-doubling perimetry and conventional threshold perimetry: changes during a 12-month follow-up in preperimetric glaucoma. A pilot study. Holló G; Szabó A; Vargha P Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2001 Aug; 79(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 11453863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [The 8-year follow-up study for clinical diagnostic potentials of frequency-doubling technology perimetry for perimetrically normal eyes of open-angle glaucoma patients with unilateral visual field loss]. Fan X; Wu LL; Xiao GG; Ma ZZ; Liu F Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2018 Mar; 54(3):177-183. PubMed ID: 29518875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Humphrey MATRIX and Swedish interactive threshold algorithm standard strategy in detecting early glaucomatous visual field loss. Prema R; George R; Hemamalini A; Sathyamangalam Ve R; Baskaran M; Vijaya L Indian J Ophthalmol; 2009; 57(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 19384015 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of glaucomatous visual field changes using the Moorfields regression analysis of the Heidelberg retina tomograph. Miglior S; Guareschi M; Albe' E; Gomarasca S; Vavassori M; Orzalesi N Am J Ophthalmol; 2003 Jul; 136(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 12834666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Can frequency-doubling technology and short-wavelength automated perimetries detect visual field defects before standard automated perimetry in patients with preperimetric glaucoma? Ferreras A; Polo V; Larrosa JM; Pablo LE; Pajarin AB; Pueyo V; Honrubia FM J Glaucoma; 2007; 16(4):372-83. PubMed ID: 17571000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hemifield association between blue-on-yellow visual field and optic nerve head topographic measurements. Teesalu P; Vihanninjoki K; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 1998 May; 236(5):339-45. PubMed ID: 9602317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Usefulness of frequency doubling technology as a screening test for glaucoma]. Saito M; Yamashiro H; Matsumoto H; Shirato S Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2001 Jan; 105(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 11210782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]