These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. From recording discrete actions to studying continuous goal-directed behaviours in team sports. Correia V; Araújo D; Vilar L; Davids K J Sports Sci; 2013; 31(5):546-53. PubMed ID: 23140581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A reconsideration of operations research experimental designs. Reynolds J Prog Clin Biol Res; 1991; 371():377-94. PubMed ID: 1956897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: a meta-analytic review. Moritz SE; Feltz DL; Fahrbach KR; Mack DE Res Q Exerc Sport; 2000 Sep; 71(3):280-94. PubMed ID: 10999265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Current status and prominent issues in sport psychology interventions. Vealey RS Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1994 Apr; 26(4):495-502. PubMed ID: 8201907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Multi-sample confirmatory factor analysis of the Task and Ego Orientation in Sport Questionnaire. Chi L; Duda JL Res Q Exerc Sport; 1995 Jun; 66(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 7644838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The Role of Sport Science in the New Age of Digital Sport. Sandbakk Ø Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2020 Feb; 15(2):153. PubMed ID: 31883504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Strengthening the Practice of Exercise and Sport-Science Research. Halperin I; Vigotsky AD; Foster C; Pyne DB Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2018 Feb; 13(2):127-134. PubMed ID: 28787228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The power of approximate degrees of freedom tests in heteroscedastic factorial designs. Jan SL; Shieh G Behav Res Methods; 2015 Sep; 47(3):871-83. PubMed ID: 25123908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Methodological and theoretical concerns in multitask performance: a critique of Boles, Bursk, Phillips, and Perdelwitz. Vidulich MA; Tsang PS Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):46-9; discussion 50-2. PubMed ID: 17315842 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Testing vigilance: validity, reliability and sensitivity in methods development. Sarter M; Bushnell PJ Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1995 Mar; 118(2):219-22. PubMed ID: 7617811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. How many resources and how to identify them? Commentary on Boles et al. and Vidulich and Tsang. Wickens CD Hum Factors; 2007 Feb; 49(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 17315843 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Estimating prediction equations in repeated measures designs. Stanek EJ; Kline G Stat Med; 1991 Jan; 10(1):119-30. PubMed ID: 2006350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Power Calculations for General Linear Multivariate Models Including Repeated Measures Applications. Muller KE; Lavange LM; Ramey SL; Ramey CT J Am Stat Assoc; 1992 Dec; 87(420):1209-1226. PubMed ID: 24790282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The analysis of repeated measures designs: a review. Keselman HJ; Algina J; Kowalchuk RK Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2001 May; 54(Pt 1):1-20. PubMed ID: 11393894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A world beyond P: policies, strategies, tactics and advice. Drummond G Exp Physiol; 2020 Jan; 105(1):13-16. PubMed ID: 31675153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Accumulating evidence from independent studies: what we can win and what we can lose. Light RJ Stat Med; 1987; 6(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 3303250 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluating research studies using the analysis of variance (ANOVA): issues and interpretations. Fitzgerald SM; Flinn S J Hand Ther; 2000; 13(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 10718224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]