These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Environment size and the use of feature and geometric cues for reorientation. Sturz BR; Kelly DM Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Feb; 142(2):251-8. PubMed ID: 23370045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Perception of the Ponzo illusion by rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans: similarity and difference in the three primate species. Fujita K Percept Psychophys; 1997 Feb; 59(2):284-92. PubMed ID: 9055623 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Spatial orienting of attention in adult and aged rhesus monkeys. Baxter MG; Voytko ML Behav Neurosci; 1996 Oct; 110(5):898-904. PubMed ID: 8918993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Covert orienting of attention in macaques. I. Effects of behavioral context. Bowman EM; Brown VJ; Kertzman C; Schwarz U; Robinson DL J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):431-43. PubMed ID: 8360720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dissecting the geometric module: a sense linkage for metric and landmark information in animals' spatial reorientation. Sovrano VA; Vallortigara G Psychol Sci; 2006 Jul; 17(7):616-21. PubMed ID: 16866748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Spatial reorientation in large and small enclosures: comparative and developmental perspectives. Chiandetti C; Vallortigara G Cogn Process; 2008 Dec; 9(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 18196304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sex differences and the effect of instruction on reorientation abilities by humans. Siemens MN; Kelly DM Mem Cognit; 2018 May; 46(4):566-576. PubMed ID: 29282642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The relative importance of location and feature cues for homing pigeon (Columba livia) goal recognition. Strasser R; Bingman VP J Comp Psychol; 1996 Mar; 110(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 8851555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Gaze following and joint attention in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Emery NJ; Lorincz EN; Perrett DI; Oram MW; Baker CI J Comp Psychol; 1997 Sep; 111(3):286-93. PubMed ID: 9286096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Visually guided facial actions in rhesus monkeys. Izumi A; Kuraoka K; Kojima S; Nakamura K Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2001 Sep; 1(3):266-9. PubMed ID: 12467126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Behavioral assessment of motion parallax and stereopsis as depth cues in rhesus monkeys. Cao A; Schiller PH Vision Res; 2002 Jul; 42(16):1953-61. PubMed ID: 12160568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lateralized fish perform better than nonlateralized fish in spatial reorientation tasks. Sovrano VA; Dadda M; Bisazza A Behav Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 163(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 15941602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Operant behavioral analysis of memory loss in monkeys with prefrontal lesions. Kojima S; Kojima M; Goldman-Rakic PS Brain Res; 1982 Sep; 248(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 7127142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Insights from a rodent navigation model. Sheynikhovich D; Chavarriaga R; Strösslin T; Arleo A; Gerstner W Psychol Rev; 2009 Jul; 116(3):540-66. PubMed ID: 19618986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]