These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11562930)
21. Attitudes, knowledge, risk perceptions and decision-making among women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 and their spouses. Bluman LG; Rimer BK; Regan Sterba K; Lancaster J; Clark S; Borstelmann N; Iglehart JD; Winer EP Psychooncology; 2003; 12(5):410-27. PubMed ID: 12833555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Adherence Patterns to National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines for Referral of Women With Breast Cancer to Genetics Professionals. Stuckey A; Febbraro T; Laprise J; Wilbur JS; Lopes V; Robison K Am J Clin Oncol; 2016 Aug; 39(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 24710121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Knowledge and expectations of women undergoing cancer genetic risk assessment: a qualitative analysis of free-text questionnaire comments. Phelps C; Wood F; Bennett P; Brain K; Gray J J Genet Couns; 2007 Aug; 16(4):505-14. PubMed ID: 17318449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Genetic counseling, testing, and screening for breast and ovarian cancer: practical and social considerations. Khabele D; Runowicz CD Curr Womens Health Rep; 2002 Jun; 2(3):163-9. PubMed ID: 12099190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cancer genetics knowledge and beliefs and receipt of results in Ashkenazi Jewish individuals receiving counseling for BRCA1/2 mutations. Kelly K; Leventhal H; Marvin M; Toppmeyer D; Baran J; Schwalb M Cancer Control; 2004; 11(4):236-44. PubMed ID: 15284715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Patient satisfaction with cancer genetic counseling: a psychometric analysis of the Genetic Counseling Satisfaction Scale. DeMarco TA; Peshkin BN; Mars BD; Tercyak KP J Genet Couns; 2004 Aug; 13(4):293-304. PubMed ID: 19736695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing. Lerman C; Biesecker B; Benkendorf JL; Kerner J; Gomez-Caminero A; Hughes C; Reed MM J Natl Cancer Inst; 1997 Jan; 89(2):148-57. PubMed ID: 8998184 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Cost of genetic counseling and testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer susceptibility mutations. Lawrence WF; Peshkin BN; Liang W; Isaacs C; Lerman C; Mandelblatt JS Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 May; 10(5):475-81. PubMed ID: 11352857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A pre-visit website with question prompt sheet for counselees facilitates communication in the first consultation for breast cancer genetic counseling: findings from a randomized controlled trial. Albada A; van Dulmen S; Ausems MG; Bensing JM Genet Med; 2012 May; 14(5):535-42. PubMed ID: 22241101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Participation in breast cancer susceptibility testing protocols: influence of recruitment source, altruism, and family involvement on women's decisions. Geller G; Doksum T; Bernhardt BA; Metz SA Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Apr; 8(4 Pt 2):377-83. PubMed ID: 10207643 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Impact of an embedded genetic counselor on breast cancer treatment. Pederson HJ; Hussain N; Noss R; Yanda C; O'Rourke C; Eng C; Grobmyer SR Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 May; 169(1):43-46. PubMed ID: 29349711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interactive decision support for risk management: a qualitative evaluation in cancer genetic counselling sessions. Glasspool DW; Oettinger A; Braithwaite D; Fox J J Cancer Educ; 2010 Sep; 25(3):312-6. PubMed ID: 20162470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. High patient satisfaction with a simplified BRCA1/2 testing procedure: long-term results of a prospective study. Nilsson MP; Nilsson ED; Borg Å; Brandberg Y; Silfverberg B; Loman N Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jan; 173(2):313-318. PubMed ID: 30311024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Follow-up effects of a tailored pre-counseling website with question prompt in breast cancer genetic counseling. Albada A; van Dulmen S; Spreeuwenberg P; Ausems MG Patient Educ Couns; 2015 Jan; 98(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 25455796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparing Outcomes of Genetic Counseling Options in Breast and Ovarian Cancer: An Integrative Review . Fournier DM; Bazzell AF; Dains JE Oncol Nurs Forum; 2018 Jan; 45(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 29251290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Patient Perceptions of Telephone vs. In-Person BRCA1/BRCA2 Genetic Counseling. Peshkin BN; Kelly S; Nusbaum RH; Similuk M; DeMarco TA; Hooker GW; Valdimarsdottir HB; Forman AD; Joines JR; Davis C; McCormick SR; McKinnon W; Graves KD; Isaacs C; Garber J; Wood M; Jandorf L; Schwartz MD J Genet Couns; 2016 Jun; 25(3):472-82. PubMed ID: 26455498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of a shared decision making program for women suspected to have a genetic predisposition to breast cancer: preliminary results. Stalmeier PF; Unic IJ; Verhoef LC; Van Daal WA Med Decis Making; 1999; 19(3):230-41. PubMed ID: 10424830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Interventions to improve patient education regarding multifactorial genetic conditions: a systematic review. Meilleur KG; Littleton-Kearney MT Am J Med Genet A; 2009 Feb; 149A(4):819-30. PubMed ID: 19291763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Breast cancer genetic counseling after diagnosis but before treatment: a pilot study on treatment consequences and psychological impact. Wevers MR; Hahn DE; Verhoef S; Bolhaar MD; Ausems MG; Aaronson NK; Bleiker EM Patient Educ Couns; 2012 Oct; 89(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 22543000 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Attitudes and psychological impact of genetic testing, genetic counseling, and breast cancer risk assessment among women at increased risk. Hutson SP Oncol Nurs Forum; 2003; 30(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 12692658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]