These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11563425)

  • 1. Repeatability of subjective refraction in myopic and keratoconic subjects: results of vector analysis.
    Raasch TW; Schechtman KB; Davis LJ; Zadnik K;
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2001 Sep; 21(5):376-83. PubMed ID: 11563425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Repeatability of refraction and corrected visual acuity in keratoconus. The CLEK Study Group. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus.
    Davis LJ; Schechtman KB; Begley CG; Shin JA; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Dec; 75(12):887-96. PubMed ID: 9875994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Agreement Between Autorefraction and Subjective Refraction in Keraring-Implanted Keratoconic Eyes.
    Al-Tuwairqi WS; Ogbuehi KC; Razzouk H; Alanazi MA; Osuagwu UL
    Eye Contact Lens; 2017 Mar; 43(2):116-122. PubMed ID: 26825280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Changes in refraction, ocular aberrations, and corneal structure after suspending rigid gas-permeable contact lens wear in keratoconus.
    Jinabhai A; O'Donnell C; Radhakrishnan H
    Cornea; 2012 May; 31(5):500-8. PubMed ID: 22314817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual acuity repeatability in keratoconus: impact on sample size. Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study Group.
    Gordon MO; Schechtman KB; Davis LJ; McMahon TT; Schornack J; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 1998 Apr; 75(4):249-57. PubMed ID: 9586749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contrast sensitivity function after correcting residual wavefront aberrations during RGP lens wear.
    Yang B; Liang B; Liu L; Liao M; Li Q; Dai Y; Zhao H; Zhang Y; Zhou Y
    Optom Vis Sci; 2014 Oct; 91(10):1271-7. PubMed ID: 24770353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison between subjective refraction and aberrometry-derived refraction in keratoconus patients and control subjects.
    Jinabhai A; O'Donnell C; Radhakrishnan H
    Curr Eye Res; 2010 Aug; 35(8):703-14. PubMed ID: 20673047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variables affecting rigid contact lens comfort in the collaborative longitudinal evaluation of keratoconus (CLEK) study.
    Edrington TB; Gundel RE; Libassi DP; Wagner H; Pierce GE; Walline JJ; Barr JT; Olafsson HE; Steger-May K; Achtenberg J; Wilson BS; Gordon MO; Zadnik K;
    Optom Vis Sci; 2004 Mar; 81(3):182-8. PubMed ID: 15017177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of Contact Lens Corrected Quality of Vision and Life of Keratoconus and Myopic Patients.
    Lee S; Jung G; Lee HK
    Korean J Ophthalmol; 2017 Dec; 31(6):489-496. PubMed ID: 29022291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Changes of ocular higher order aberration in on- and off-eye of rigid gas permeable contact lenses.
    Choi J; Wee WR; Lee JH; Kim MK
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jan; 84(1):42-51. PubMed ID: 17220777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Hybrid material contact lens in keratoconus and myopic astigmatism patients].
    Leal F; Lipener C; Chalita MR; Uras R; Campos M; Höfling-Lima AL
    Arq Bras Oftalmol; 2007; 70(2):247-54. PubMed ID: 17589695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contact lenses in the management of keratoconus.
    Barnett M; Mannis MJ
    Cornea; 2011 Dec; 30(12):1510-6. PubMed ID: 21993461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Repeatability of Wavefront Aberration Measurements With a Placido-Based Topographer in Normal and Keratoconic Eyes.
    Ortiz-Toquero S; Rodriguez G; de Juan V; Martin R
    J Refract Surg; 2016 May; 32(5):338-44. PubMed ID: 27163620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of multifocal soft contact lenses on peripheral refraction.
    Kang P; Fan Y; Oh K; Trac K; Zhang F; Swarbrick HA
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Jul; 90(7):658-66. PubMed ID: 23748848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual acuity and ocular aberrations with different rigid gas permeable lens fittings in keratoconus.
    Jinabhai A; Radhakrishnan H; O'Donnell C
    Eye Contact Lens; 2010 Jul; 36(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 20543704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Repeatability and accuracy of automated refraction: a comparison of the Nikon NRK-8000, the Nidek AR-1000, and subjective refraction.
    Elliott M; Simpson T; Richter D; Fonn D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jun; 74(6):434-8. PubMed ID: 9255823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Peripheral refraction for distance and near vision in emmetropes and myopes.
    Calver R; Radhakrishnan H; Osuobeni E; O'Leary D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 Nov; 27(6):584-93. PubMed ID: 17956364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Between-eye asymmetry in keratoconus.
    Zadnik K; Steger-May K; Fink BA; Joslin CE; Nichols JJ; Rosenstiel CE; Tyler JA; Yu JA; Raasch TW; Schechtman KB;
    Cornea; 2002 Oct; 21(7):671-9. PubMed ID: 12352084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Autorefraction Versus Manifest Refraction in Patients With Keratoconus.
    Soeters N; Muijzer MB; Molenaar J; Godefrooij DA; Wisse RPL
    J Refract Surg; 2018 Jan; 34(1):30-34. PubMed ID: 29315439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical quality and visual performance with customised soft contact lenses for keratoconus.
    Jinabhai A; O'Donnell C; Tromans C; Radhakrishnan H
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 Sep; 34(5):528-39. PubMed ID: 24758229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.