These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11564032)

  • 1. Autoaugmentation peritoneocystoplasty in a sheep model.
    Close CE; Dewan PA; Ashwood PJ; Byard RJ; Mitchell ME
    BJU Int; 2001 Sep; 88(4):414-7. PubMed ID: 11564032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty: further studies of the sheep model.
    Close CE; Anderson PD; Edwards GA; Mitchell ME; Dewan PA
    BJU Int; 2004 Sep; 94(4):658-62. PubMed ID: 15329131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can the outcome of autoaugmentation omentocystoplasty be improved? Urodynamic, histological, and collagen content evaluation in sheep model.
    Burgu B; Keskin S; Orhan D; Ozgencil E; Senel O; Aydogdu O; Dogan HS; Tekgul S
    Neurourol Urodyn; 2011 Sep; 30(7):1371-5. PubMed ID: 21404322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can the effect of adhesion barriers and/or intravesical balloon inflation improve bladder autoaugmentation outcomes in a rabbit model?
    Okutucu TM; Telli O; Ozturk E; Suer E; Hamidi N; Burgu B
    J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Apr; 11(2):86.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25869825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty and demucosalized gastrocystoplasty in a sheep model.
    Dewan PA; Stefanek W; Lorenz C; Owen AJ; Byard RW
    Urology; 1995 Feb; 45(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 7855977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of different bladder autoaugmentation techniques in a rabbit model.
    Eliçevik M; Celayir S; Dervisoglu S; Büyükünal SN
    Br J Urol; 1998 Jan; 81(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 9467476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Autoaugmentation omentocystoplasty in a sheep model.
    Dewan PA; Stefanek W; Lorenz C; Byard RW
    Urology; 1994 Jun; 43(6):888-91. PubMed ID: 8197659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Laparoscopic laser-assisted bladder autoaugmentation.
    Britanisky RG; Poppas DP; Shichman SN; Mininberg DT; Sosa RE
    Urology; 1995 Jul; 46(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 7604477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bladder autoaugmentation in myelodysplastic children.
    Skobejko-Wlodarska L; Strulak K; Nachulewicz P; Szymkiewicz C
    Br J Urol; 1998 May; 81 Suppl 3():114-6. PubMed ID: 9634034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Demucosalized augmentation gastrocystoplasty with bladder autoaugmentation in pediatric patients.
    Nguyen DH; Mitchell ME; Horowitz M; Bagli DJ; Carr MC
    J Urol; 1996 Jul; 156(1):206-9. PubMed ID: 8648806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laplace's law and the risks and prevention of bladder rupture after enterocystoplasty and bladder autoaugmentation.
    Chancellor MB; Rivas DA; Bourgeois IM
    Neurourol Urodyn; 1996; 15(3):223-33. PubMed ID: 8732989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Autoaugmentation gastrocystoplasty in a sheep model.
    Dewan PA; Byard RW
    Br J Urol; 1993 Jul; 72(1):56-9. PubMed ID: 8149181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enteric mucosal regrowth after bladder augmentation using demucosalized gut segments.
    Dewan PA; Close CE; Byard RW; Ashwood PJ; Mitchell ME
    J Urol; 1997 Sep; 158(3 Pt 2):1141-6. PubMed ID: 9258158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bladder autoaugmentation with rectus muscle backing.
    Perovic SV; Djordjevic ML; Kekic ZK; Vukadinovic VM
    J Urol; 2002 Oct; 168(4 Pt 2):1877-80. PubMed ID: 12352380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Urothelial lined colocystoplasty in a sheep model.
    Dewan PA; Lorenz C; Stefanek W; Byard RW
    Eur Urol; 1994; 26(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 7805710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Late follow up of autoaugmentation omentocystoplasty in a sheep model.
    Dewan PA; Owen AJ; Stefanek W; Lorenz C; Byard RW
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1995 Aug; 65(8):596-9. PubMed ID: 7661804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Urothelium-preserving augmentation cystoplasty covered with a peritoneal flap.
    Oge O; Tekgul S; Ergen A; Kendi S
    BJU Int; 2000 May; 85(7):802-5. PubMed ID: 10792156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bladder autoaugmentation using various biodegradable scaffolds seeded with autologous smooth muscle cells in a rabbit model.
    Lai JY; Chang PY; Lin JN
    J Pediatr Surg; 2005 Dec; 40(12):1869-73. PubMed ID: 16338308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of bladder rupture pressure after intestinal bladder augmentation (ileocystoplasty) and myomyotomy (autoaugmentation).
    Rivas DA; Chancellor MB; Huang B; Epple A; Figueroa TE
    Urology; 1996 Jul; 48(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 8693650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bladder augmentation with acellular dermal biomatrix in a diseased animal model.
    Akbal C; Lee SD; Packer SC; Davis MM; Rink RC; Kaefer M
    J Urol; 2006 Oct; 176(4 Pt 2):1706-11. PubMed ID: 16945628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.