These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11565273)

  • 1. Supreme Court rules in Martin, Penry, and Buckhannon cases.
    Parry JW
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2001; 25(4):517-9. PubMed ID: 11565273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Penry revisited: is execution of a person who has mental retardation cruel and unusual?
    Herbert PB; Young KA
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2):282-6. PubMed ID: 12108566
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Most court decisions support broad access to housing by disabled.
    Psychiatr Serv; 1998 Mar; 49(3):402. PubMed ID: 9525809
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mental retardation and the death penalty in the USA: the clinical and legal legacy.
    French LA
    Crim Behav Ment Health; 2005; 15(2):82-6. PubMed ID: 16470501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Rethink Casey Martin: what is a right?
    Dodson WH
    J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2001 Dec; 31(12):761-2. PubMed ID: 11767252
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Therapeutic jurisprudence and the civil rights of institutionalized mentally disabled persons: hopeless oxymoron or path to redemption?
    Perlin ML; Gould KK; Dorfman DA
    Psychol Public Policy Law; 1995 Mar; 1(1):80-119. PubMed ID: 12803207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cruelty to the mentally ill: an Eighth Amendment challenge to the abolition of the insanity defense.
    LeBlanc SM
    Am Univ Law Rev; 2007 Jun; 56(5):1281-328. PubMed ID: 17632959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Waiting for justice in an era of exonerations.
    Watson C
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2014; 42(4):408-11. PubMed ID: 25492065
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Supreme Court, "Our Town," and disability policy: boardrooms and bedrooms, courtrooms and cloakrooms.
    Stowe MJ; Turnbull HR; Sublet C
    Ment Retard; 2006 Apr; 44(2):83-99. PubMed ID: 16689619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Golf in the United States: an evolution of accessibility.
    Parziale JR
    PM R; 2014 Sep; 6(9):825-7. PubMed ID: 24713179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Observations of a water boy.
    Perske R
    Ment Retard; 2003 Feb; 41(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 12597725
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mental illness and the death penalty.
    Slobogin C
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2000; 24(4):667-77. PubMed ID: 10986859
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Supreme court agrees to define employer.
    Vierling LE
    Case Manager; 2003; 14(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 12532074
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Of pills and needs: involuntarily medicating the psychotic inmate when execution looms.
    Cantor JD
    Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):117-70. PubMed ID: 17111502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disability & ADA: Supreme Court rules on institutional confinement of disabled.
    McCants WD
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(3):281-3. PubMed ID: 11067608
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Not Available].
    Dujardin V
    Rev Infirm; 2018 Mar; 67(239):51-52. PubMed ID: 29525019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The death penalty and persons with mental disabilities: a lethal dose of stigma, sanism, fear of violence, and faulty predictions of dangerousness.
    Parry JW
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2005; 29(5):667-9. PubMed ID: 16379481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Supreme Court restricts ADA Title I as applied to the States.
    Parry JW
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2001; 25(2):155-7. PubMed ID: 11381571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The inclusion of disability as a condition for termination of parental rights.
    Lightfoot E; Hill K; LaLiberte T
    Child Abuse Negl; 2010 Dec; 34(12):927-34. PubMed ID: 21030082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supreme Court to rule on rights of people with disabilities.
    Gold S
    Caring; 1999 Jul; 18(7):26-7. PubMed ID: 10539554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.