383 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11565774)
21. Predictors of invasive breast cancer in ductal carcinoma in situ initially diagnosed by core biopsy.
Chan MY; Lim S
Asian J Surg; 2010 Apr; 33(2):76-82. PubMed ID: 21029943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Application of magnetic resonance computer-aided diagnosis for preoperatively determining invasive disease in ultrasonography-guided core needle biopsy-proven ductal carcinoma in situ.
Ahn HS; Kim SM; Kim MS; Jang M; Yun B; Kang E; Kim EK; Park SY; Kim B
Medicine (Baltimore); 2020 Jul; 99(31):e21257. PubMed ID: 32756104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The radiological excision of high risk and malignant lesions using the INTACT breast lesion excision system. A case series with an imaging follow up of at least 5 years.
Allen SD; Osin P; Nerurkar A
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):824-9. PubMed ID: 24742589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype.
Stomper PC; Connolly JL
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Sep; 159(3):483-5. PubMed ID: 1323923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Visibility in ultrasonography as the strongest invasion predictor in ductal carcinoma in situ in a retrospective study].
Vrtelová P; Coufal O; Pavlík T; Bazout M; Fait V
Klin Onkol; 2009; 22(6):278-83. PubMed ID: 20099746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy.
O'Flynn EA; Morel JC; Gonzalez J; Dutt N; Evans D; Wasan R; Michell MJ
Clin Radiol; 2009 Feb; 64(2):178-83. PubMed ID: 19103348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Predictors of invasion and axillary lymph node metastasis in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ: an analysis of 255 cases.
Han JS; Molberg KH; Sarode V
Breast J; 2011; 17(3):223-9. PubMed ID: 21545433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Stereotactic core biopsy of calcifications highly suggestive of malignancy.
Liberman L; LaTrenta LR; Van Zee KJ; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD
Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):673-7. PubMed ID: 9169687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Lobular carcinoma in situ at percutaneous breast biopsy: surgical biopsy findings.
Liberman L; Sama M; Susnik B; Rosen PP; LaTrenta LR; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):291-9. PubMed ID: 10430122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Surgical biopsy is still necessary for BI-RADS 4 calcifications found on digital mammography that are technically too faint for stereotactic core biopsy.
Jeffries DO; Neal CH; Noroozian M; Joe AI; Pinsky RW; Goodsitt MM; Helvie MA
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Dec; 154(3):557-61. PubMed ID: 26589316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Histopathological characteristics of breast ductal carcinoma in situ and association with imaging findings.
Tang X; Yamashita T; Hara M; Kumaki N; Tokuda Y; Masuda S
Breast Cancer; 2016 May; 23(3):491-8. PubMed ID: 25644245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Calcification retrieval at stereotactic, 11-gauge, directional, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
Liberman L; Smolkin JH; Dershaw DD; Morris EA; Abramson AF; Rosen PP
Radiology; 1998 Jul; 208(1):251-60. PubMed ID: 9646821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Predictive factors for the presence of invasive components in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ based on preoperative biopsy.
Lee KH; Han JW; Kim EY; Yun JS; Park YL; Park CH
BMC Cancer; 2019 Dec; 19(1):1201. PubMed ID: 31822268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.
Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Jang M; Chang JM; Chung SY
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Breast ductal carcinoma in situ with micro-invasion versus ductal carcinoma in situ: a comparative analysis of clinicopathological and mammographic findings.
Zhang M; Lin Q; Su XH; Cui CX; Bian TT; Wang CQ; Zhao J; Li LL; Ma JZ; Huang JL
Clin Radiol; 2021 Oct; 76(10):787.e1-787.e7. PubMed ID: 34052010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Risk of invasion and axillary lymph node metastasis in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed by core-needle biopsy.
Meijnen P; Oldenburg HS; Loo CE; Nieweg OE; Peterse JL; Rutgers EJ
Br J Surg; 2007 Aug; 94(8):952-6. PubMed ID: 17440955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pathological prognostic factors of invasive breast carcinoma in ultrasound-guided large core biopsies-correlation with subsequent surgical excisions.
Badoual C; Maruani A; Ghorra C; Lebas P; Avigdor S; Michenet P
Breast; 2005 Feb; 14(1):22-7. PubMed ID: 15695077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pathologic findings of follow-up surgical excision for lobular neoplasia on breast core biopsy performed for calcification.
Zhao C; Desouki MM; Florea A; Mohammed K; Li X; Dabbs D
Am J Clin Pathol; 2012 Jul; 138(1):72-8. PubMed ID: 22706860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Screening-detected calcified and non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ: differences in the imaging and histopathological features.
Mun HS; Shin HJ; Kim HH; Cha JH; Kim H
Clin Radiol; 2013 Jan; 68(1):e27-35. PubMed ID: 23177096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Predictive significance of breast-specific gamma imaging for upstaging core-needle biopsy-detected ductal carcinoma in situ to invasive cancer.
Yoo J; Kim BS; Yoon HJ
Ann Nucl Med; 2018 Jun; 32(5):328-336. PubMed ID: 29556944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
