These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11565943)

  • 1. Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese bitransitive sentences with a differing number of arguments.
    Nagata H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2001 Jun; 92(3 Pt 2):993-1001. PubMed ID: 11565943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Judgments of grammaticality of sentences with a differing number of arguments: a comparison of English and Japanese speakers.
    Nagata H; Bain B
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Oct; 91(2):503-11. PubMed ID: 11065310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese sentences lacking an argument or an adjunct.
    Nagata H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Dec; 95(3 Pt 2):1259-66. PubMed ID: 12578269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese sentences violating the principle of full interpretation.
    Nagata H
    J Psycholinguist Res; 2003 Nov; 32(6):693-709. PubMed ID: 14653014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Faulty Japanese sentences are judged more grammatical when punctuation is used: negative implications for Chomsky's principle of Full Interpretation.
    Nagata H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Aug; 99(1):325-36. PubMed ID: 15446660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Judgments of grammaticality of sentences violating the principle of full interpretation: a further exploration.
    Nagata H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2003 Oct; 97(2):477-82. PubMed ID: 14620235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Judgments of grammaticality of Japanese simple sentences involving two arguments in a whole-part relation: a further examination of Chomsky's principle of Full Interpretation.
    Nagata H
    Percept Mot Skills; 2006 Jun; 102(3):855-70. PubMed ID: 16916165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Judgments of grammaticality by normal and language-disordered children.
    Liles BZ; Shulman MD; Bartlett S
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1977 May; 42(2):199-209. PubMed ID: 870751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grammaticality, Acceptability, and Probability: A Probabilistic View of Linguistic Knowledge.
    Lau JH; Clark A; Lappin S
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Jul; 41(5):1202-1241. PubMed ID: 27732744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Analysis and control in children with SLI.
    Lum JA; Bavin EL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1618-30. PubMed ID: 18055776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is Syntax Semantically Constrained? Evidence From a Grammaticality Judgment Study of Indonesian.
    Aryawibawa IN; Ambridge B
    Cogn Sci; 2018 Nov; 42(8):3135-3148. PubMed ID: 30375023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of priming in grammatical acceptability judgements for native versus non-native speakers: Effects of intelligibility.
    Constantine RR; Getty DJ; Fraundorf SH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275191. PubMed ID: 36170327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The grammaticality asymmetry in agreement attraction reflects response bias: Experimental and modeling evidence.
    Hammerly C; Staub A; Dillon B
    Cogn Psychol; 2019 May; 110():70-104. PubMed ID: 30798061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Is grammar spared in autism spectrum disorder? Data from judgments of verb argument structure overgeneralization errors.
    Ambridge B; Bannard C; Jackson GH
    J Autism Dev Disord; 2015 Oct; 45(10):3288-96. PubMed ID: 26048042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Judgements about double-embedded relative clauses differ between languages.
    Frank SL; Ernst P
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1581-1593. PubMed ID: 29687232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Grammaticality judgment in aphasia: deficits are not specific to syntactic structures, aphasic syndromes, or lesion sites.
    Wilson SM; Saygin AP
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):238-52. PubMed ID: 15068594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The cerebellum and English grammatical morphology: evidence from production, comprehension, and grammaticality judgments.
    Justus T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Sep; 16(7):1115-30. PubMed ID: 15453968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Agreement processing and attraction errors in aging: evidence from subject-verb agreement in German.
    Reifegerste J; Hauer F; Felser C
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2017 Nov; 24(6):672-702. PubMed ID: 27819532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Direct Versus Indirect Causation as a Semantic Linguistic Universal: Using a Computational Model of English, Hebrew, Hindi, Japanese, and K'iche' Mayan to Predict Grammaticality Judgments in Balinese.
    Aryawibawa IN; Qomariana Y; Artawa K; Ambridge B
    Cogn Sci; 2021 Apr; 45(4):e12974. PubMed ID: 33877699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Acceptable Ungrammatical Sentences, Unacceptable Grammatical Sentences, and the Role of the Cognitive Parser.
    Leivada E; Westergaard M
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():364. PubMed ID: 32210884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.