These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11566237)

  • 1. Three tests of 'anticipatory responding' as an account for induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Himle MB; Plumm KM; Moulton PL
    Behav Processes; 2001 Oct; 56(1):49-66. PubMed ID: 11566237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus control over induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Tischart LM; Palbicki J
    Behav Processes; 2003 Aug; 64(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 12915001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of second-half reinforcer type on responding for sucrose in the first half of the session.
    Weatherly JN; Stout JE; Rue HC; Melville CL
    Behav Processes; 2000 Mar; 49(1):43-60. PubMed ID: 10725652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating retrospective influences on induction in rats' responding for 1% sucrose when food-pellet reinforcement is upcoming.
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 16475670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Upcoming food-pellet reinforcement alters rats' lever pressing for liquid sucrose delivered by a progressive-ratio schedule.
    Weatherly JN; King BM; Uran EL
    Behav Processes; 2003 Jun; 63(2):73-86. PubMed ID: 12763270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Is induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement the outcome of an increase in overall activity or in operant responding?
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Nurnberger JT
    J Gen Psychol; 2006 Jan; 133(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 16475671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Altering "motivational" variables alters induction produced by upcoming food-pellet reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Arthur EI; Tischart LM
    Anim Cogn; 2003 Mar; 6(1):17-26. PubMed ID: 12658532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of upcoming food-pellet delivery on subjects' responding for 1% sucrose reinforcement delivered by concurrent random-interval schedules.
    Weatherly JN; Grove C; Beste R
    J Gen Psychol; 2007 Apr; 134(2):121-31. PubMed ID: 17503690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the determinants of induction in responding for sucrose when food pellet reinforcement is upcoming.
    Weatherly JN; Plumm KM; Smith JR; Roberts WA
    Anim Learn Behav; 2002 Nov; 30(4):315-29. PubMed ID: 12593324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Duration, response, and location: the influence of upcoming 32% sucrose on rats' licking or lever pressing for 1% liquid sucrose.
    Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Arthur EI; King BM
    Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):80-90. PubMed ID: 15939550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of place of reinforcer delivery in the appearance of positive induction when rats respond for 1% sucrose.
    Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Kristiansen-Moen LA
    Behav Processes; 2006 Sep; 73(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 16782285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Within-session responding when different reinforcers are delivered in each half of the session.
    Weatherly JN; Stout JE; McMurry AS; Rue HC; Melville CL
    Behav Processes; 1999 Jul; 46(3):227-43. PubMed ID: 24896446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of upcoming reward type when rats press a lever for ethanol.
    Weatherly JN; Bishop KL; Borowiak DM
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Apr; 131(2):181-92. PubMed ID: 15088869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Induction when rats lick for 1% liquid-sucrose reinforcement.
    Weatherly JN; Lang KK; King BM; Beste R; Grove C
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Apr; 59(4):654-66. PubMed ID: 16707355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Within-session rates of responding when reinforcer magnitude is changed within the session.
    Weatherly JN; McSweeney FK; Swindell S
    J Gen Psychol; 2004 Jan; 131(1):5-16. PubMed ID: 14977028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Attenuation of sucrose reinforcement in dopamine D1 receptor deficient mice.
    El-Ghundi M; O'Dowd BF; Erclik M; George SR
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Feb; 17(4):851-62. PubMed ID: 12603275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of response-contingent incentives in lithium chloride-mediated suppression of an operant response.
    Meachum CL
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 1990 May; 42(2):175-95. PubMed ID: 2164238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Behavioral economics of concurrent ethanol-sucrose and sucrose reinforcement in the rat: effects of altering variable-ratio requirements.
    Petry NM; Heyman GM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Nov; 64(3):331-59. PubMed ID: 8551192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Interactions between the effects of food and water motivating operations on food- and water-reinforced responding in mice.
    Lewon M; Spurlock ED; Peters CM; Hayes LJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2019 May; 111(3):493-507. PubMed ID: 31038215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of accumbens dopamine in lever pressing and response allocation: effects of 6-OHDA injected into core and dorsomedial shell.
    Sokolowski JD; Salamone JD
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Mar; 59(3):557-66. PubMed ID: 9512057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.