These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11566237)

  • 21. The role of accumbens dopamine in lever pressing and response allocation: effects of 6-OHDA injected into core and dorsomedial shell.
    Sokolowski JD; Salamone JD
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1998 Mar; 59(3):557-66. PubMed ID: 9512057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effect of body weight manipulation.
    Belke TW
    Behav Processes; 2004 Feb; 65(2):189-99. PubMed ID: 15222966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Differential activation of accumbens shell and core dopamine by sucrose reinforcement with nose poking and with lever pressing.
    Bassareo V; Cucca F; Frau R; Di Chiara G
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Nov; 294():215-23. PubMed ID: 26275926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Suppression of behavior by food pellet-lithium chloride pairings in squirrel monkeys.
    Bergman J; Glowa JR
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1986 Nov; 25(5):973-8. PubMed ID: 3024186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Role of food type in yohimbine- and pellet-priming-induced reinstatement of food seeking.
    Nair SG; Gray SM; Ghitza UE
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Jul; 88(4-5):559-66. PubMed ID: 16806322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Investigating the procedural variables that determine whether rats will display negative anticipatory contrast or positive induction.
    Weatherly JN; Nurnberger JT; Hanson BC
    Behav Processes; 2005 Aug; 70(1):10-8. PubMed ID: 15913919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of shifts in food reinforcement context on rats' consumption of concurrently available water or sucrose solution.
    Galuska CM; Sawyer LE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2017 Jan; 107(1):85-100. PubMed ID: 28101921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of amphetamine on food and fruit drink self-administration.
    Foltin RW
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2000 Feb; 8(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 10743903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dopamine receptors in the medial prefrontal cortex influence ethanol and sucrose-reinforced responding.
    Hodge CW; Chappelle AM; Samson HH
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 1996 Dec; 20(9):1631-8. PubMed ID: 8986215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Within-session changes in key and lever pressing for water during several multiple variable-interval schedules.
    McSweeney FK; Weatherly JN; Swindell S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1995 Jul; 64(1):75-94. PubMed ID: 16812763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Spontaneous recovery and dishabituation of ethanol-reinforced responding in alcohol-preferring rats.
    Murphy ES; McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; McDonald J; Wiediger RV
    Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2006 Nov; 14(4):471-82. PubMed ID: 17115875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Response acquisition with signaled delayed reinforcement in a rodent model of ADHD.
    Hand DJ; Fox AT; Reilly MP
    Behav Brain Res; 2010 Dec; 213(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 20438767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Operant hoarding: a new paradigm for the study of self-control.
    Cole MR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 Mar; 53(2):247-61. PubMed ID: 2324665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Response-independent milk delivery enhances persistence of pellet-reinforced lever pressing by rats.
    Grimes JA; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2001 Sep; 76(2):179-94. PubMed ID: 11599638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Ethanol reinforcement in nondeprived mice: effects of abstinence and naltrexone.
    Middaugh LD; Lee AM; Bandy AL
    Alcohol Clin Exp Res; 2000 Aug; 24(8):1172-9. PubMed ID: 10968654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Substitution and caloric regulation in a closed economy.
    Bauman RA; Raslear TG; Hursh SR; Shurtleff D; Simmons L
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1996 Mar; 65(2):401-22. PubMed ID: 8851540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Time-, schedule-, and reinforcer-dependent effects of pimozide and amphetamine.
    Phillips G; Willner P; Sampson D; Nunn J; Muscat R
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1991; 104(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 1881998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stimulus change dis-habituates operant responding supported by water reinforcers.
    McSweeney FK; Kowal BP; Murphy ES; Wiediger RS
    Behav Processes; 2005 Nov; 70(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 16112816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Responding for sucrose and wheel-running reinforcement: effects of sucrose concentration and wheel-running reinforcer duration.
    Belke TW; Hancock SD
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Mar; 79(2):243-65. PubMed ID: 12822690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The effects of pipradrol on the acquisitionof responding with conditioned reinforcement: a role for sensory preconditioning.
    Beninger RJ; Hanson DR; Phillips AG
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1980; 69(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 6106257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.