These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1156741)

  • 1. Effects of tactual and phonological similarity on the recall of Braille letters by blind children.
    Millar S
    Br J Psychol; 1975 May; 66(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 1156741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of phonological and tactual similarity on serial object recall by blind and sighted children.
    Millar S
    Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 1149476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short-term serial tactual recall: effects of grouping on tactually probed recall of Braille letters and nonsense shapes by blind children.
    Millar S
    Br J Psychol; 1978 Feb; 69(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 626802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tactual and name matching by blind children.
    Millar S
    Br J Psychol; 1977 Aug; 68(3):377-87. PubMed ID: 890225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Early stages of tactual matching.
    Millar S
    Perception; 1977; 6(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 866090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phonological and tactual coding of Braille by blind children.
    Pring L
    Br J Psychol; 1982 Aug; 73 (Pt 3)():351-9. PubMed ID: 7116082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Size and modality effects in Braille learning: Implications for the blind child from pre-reading sighted children.
    Barlow-Brown F; Barker C; Harris M
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2019 Mar; 89(1):165-176. PubMed ID: 29911353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phonological similarity in the serial recall task hinders item recall, not just order.
    Roodenrys S; Guitard D; Miller LM; Saint-Aubin J; Barron JM
    Br J Psychol; 2022 Nov; 113(4):1100-1120. PubMed ID: 35692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When does between-sequence phonological similarity promote irrelevant sound disruption?
    Marsh JE; Vachon F; Jones DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):243-8. PubMed ID: 18194067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Tactile memory in sighted and blind observers: the influence of orientation and rate of presentation.
    Heller MA
    Perception; 1989; 18(1):121-33. PubMed ID: 2771591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recall of short word lists presented visually at fast rates: effects of phonological similarity and word length.
    Coltheart V; Langdon R
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Mar; 26(2):330-42. PubMed ID: 9584440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and phonetic memory in preschool children: evidence for coding flexibility.
    Brown RM
    Percept Mot Skills; 1977 Dec; 45(3 Pt 2):1043-50. PubMed ID: 604878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall.
    Gathercole SE; Pickering SJ; Hall M; Peaker SM
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):1-30. PubMed ID: 11216312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop.
    Spurgeon J; Ward G; Matthews WJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jul; 40(4):1110-41. PubMed ID: 24564540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Some evidence for 'speech' as an acoustic feature.
    Morton J; Chambers SM
    Br J Psychol; 1976 Feb; 67(1):31-45. PubMed ID: 1268450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual similarity effects in immediate verbal serial recall.
    Logie RH; Della Sala S; Wynn V; Baddeley AD
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Aug; 53(3):626-46. PubMed ID: 10994221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Irrelevant speech does not interfere with serial recall in early blind listeners.
    Kattner F; Ellermeier W
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2207-17. PubMed ID: 24796760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Influence of articulatory suppression and memory updating on phonological similarity effect].
    Saito S
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 1993 Oct; 64(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 8301894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential cognitive and perceptual correlates of print reading versus braille reading.
    Veispak A; Boets B; Ghesquière P
    Res Dev Disabil; 2013 Jan; 34(1):372-85. PubMed ID: 23000636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.