These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

78 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11568329)

  • 1. Blinded review of retrospectively visible unreported breast cancers: an eye-position analysis.
    Nodine CF; Mello-Thoms C; Weinstein SP; Kundel HL; Conant EF; Heller-Savoy RE; Rowlings SE; Birnbaum JA
    Radiology; 2001 Oct; 221(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 11568329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Time course of perception and decision making during mammographic interpretation.
    Nodine CF; Mello-Thoms C; Kundel HL; Weinstein SP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Oct; 179(4):917-23. PubMed ID: 12239037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of lesion conspicuity on visual search in mammogram reading.
    Mello-Thoms C; Hardesty L; Sumkin J; Ganott M; Hakim C; Britton C; Stalder J; Maitz G
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):830-40. PubMed ID: 16039537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. How does the perception of a lesion influence visual search strategy in mammogram reading?
    Mello-Thoms C
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):275-88. PubMed ID: 16488839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience.
    Destounis SV; DiNitto P; Logan-Young W; Bonaccio E; Zuley ML; Willison KM
    Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):578-84. PubMed ID: 15229350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Screening mammography-detected cancers: sensitivity of a computer-aided detection system applied to full-field digital mammograms.
    Yang SK; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Cha JH; Kim SM; Kim SJ; Im JG
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 17507722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Breast carcinoma diagnosed in mammographic screening incidentally. Research on the radiologic signs in prior mammograms].
    Marra V; Frigerio A; Di Virgilio MR; Menna S; Burke P
    Radiol Med; 1999 Nov; 98(5):342-6. PubMed ID: 10780212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast lesion detection and classification: comparison of screen-film mammography and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--observer performance study.
    Skaane P; Balleyguier C; Diekmann F; Diekmann S; Piguet JC; Young K; Niklason LT
    Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 16100086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Warren Burhenne LJ; Wood SA; D'Orsi CJ; Feig SA; Kopans DB; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Tabar L; Vyborny CJ; Castellino RA
    Radiology; 2000 May; 215(2):554-62. PubMed ID: 10796939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Previous mammograms in patients with impalpable breast carcinoma: retrospective vs blinded interpretation. 1993 ARRS President's Award.
    Harvey JA; Fajardo LL; Innis CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Dec; 161(6):1167-72. PubMed ID: 8249720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image features of true positive and false negative cancers in screening mammograms.
    Meeson S; Young KC; Wallis MG; Cooke J; Cummin A; Ramsdale ML
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Jan; 76(901):13-21. PubMed ID: 12595320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of 172 subtle findings on prior normal mammograms in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening.
    Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Brenner RJ; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2003 Feb; 226(2):494-503. PubMed ID: 12563145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Second round cancers: how many were visible on the first round of the UK National Breast Screening Programme, three years earlier?
    Daly CA; Apthorp L; Field S
    Clin Radiol; 1998 Jan; 53(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 9464431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.
    Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA
    Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 11274556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided detection in screening mammography: variability in cues.
    Baker JA; Lo JY; Delong DM; Floyd CE
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):411-7. PubMed ID: 15358850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided detection in full-field digital mammography: sensitivity and reproducibility in serial examinations.
    Kim SJ; Moon WK; Cho N; Cha JH; Kim SM; Im JG
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 18096530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Selective use of the oblique projection in mammography.
    Hall FM; Berenberg AL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Sep; 131(3):465-8. PubMed ID: 98991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Additional double reading of screening mammograms by radiologic technologists: impact on screening performance parameters.
    Duijm LE; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1162-70. PubMed ID: 17652282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The perception of breast cancer: what differentiates missed from reported cancers in mammography?
    Mello-Thoms C; Dunn S; Nodine CF; Kundel HL; Weinstein SP
    Acad Radiol; 2002 Sep; 9(9):1004-12. PubMed ID: 12238541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.