These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11568329)

  • 21. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
    Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
    Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual search of mammographic images: influence of lesion subtlety.
    Krupinski EA
    Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):965-9. PubMed ID: 16023379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of breast lesion size and histologic findings on tumor detection rate of a computer-aided detection system.
    Malich A; Sauner D; Marx C; Facius M; Boehm T; Pfleiderer SO; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
    Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):851-6. PubMed ID: 12869683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Computerized detection of breast masses in digitized mammograms.
    Varela C; Tahoces PG; Méndez AJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    Comput Biol Med; 2007 Feb; 37(2):214-26. PubMed ID: 16620805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of computer-aided detection on independent double reading of paired screen-film and full-field digital screening mammograms.
    Skaane P; Kshirsagar A; Stapleton S; Young K; Castellino RA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):377-84. PubMed ID: 17242245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Head-mounted versus remote eye tracking of radiologists searching for breast cancer: a comparison.
    Mello-Thoms C; Britton C; Abrams G; Hakim C; Shah R; Hardesty L; Maitz G; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):203-9. PubMed ID: 16428056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Testing the effect of computer-assisted detection on interpretive performance in screening mammography.
    Taplin SH; Rutter CM; Lehman CD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1475-82. PubMed ID: 17114540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast cancer detection: one versus two views.
    Bassett LW; Bunnell DH; Jahanshahi R; Gold RH; Arndt RD; Linsman J
    Radiology; 1987 Oct; 165(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 3628795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Screening interval breast cancers: mammographic features and prognosis factors.
    Burrell HC; Sibbering DM; Wilson AR; Pinder SE; Evans AJ; Yeoman LJ; Elston CW; Ellis IO; Blamey RW; Robertson JF
    Radiology; 1996 Jun; 199(3):811-7. PubMed ID: 8638010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Influence of review design on percentages of missed interval breast cancers: retrospective study of interval cancers in a population-based screening program.
    Hofvind S; Skaane P; Vitak B; Wang H; Thoresen S; Eriksen L; Bjørndal H; Braaten A; Bjurstam N
    Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):437-43. PubMed ID: 16244251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancer.
    Lewin JM; D'Orsi CJ; Hendrick RE; Moss LJ; Isaacs PK; Karellas A; Cutter GR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2002 Sep; 179(3):671-7. PubMed ID: 12185042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The visibility of cancer on previous mammograms in retrospective review.
    Saarenmaa I; Salminen T; Geiger U; Heikkinen P; Hyvärinen S; Isola J; Kataja V; Kokko ML; Kokko R; Kumpulainen E; Kärkkäinen A; Pakkanen J; Peltonen P; Piironen A; Salo A; Talviala ML; Hakama M
    Clin Radiol; 2001 Jan; 56(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 11162696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Screening mammography: value in women 35-39 years old.
    Liberman L; Dershaw DD; Deutch BM; Thaler HT; Lippin BS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jul; 161(1):53-6. PubMed ID: 8517320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A true screening environment for review of interval breast cancers: pilot study to reduce bias.
    Gordon PB; Borugian MJ; Warren Burhenne LJ
    Radiology; 2007 Nov; 245(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 17848684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reassessment of breast cancers missed during routine screening mammography: a community-based study.
    Yankaskas BC; Schell MJ; Bird RE; Desrochers DA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):535-41. PubMed ID: 11517043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Diagnosis of breast cancer: contribution of US as an adjunct to mammography.
    Zonderland HM; Coerkamp EG; Hermans J; van de Vijver MJ; van Voorthuisen AE
    Radiology; 1999 Nov; 213(2):413-22. PubMed ID: 10551221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Importance of comparison of current and prior mammograms in breast cancer screening.
    Roelofs AA; Karssemeijer N; Wedekind N; Beck C; van Woudenberg S; Snoeren PR; Hendriks JH; Rosselli del Turco M; Bjurstam N; Junkermann H; Beijerinck D; Séradour B; Evertsz CJ
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):70-7. PubMed ID: 17185661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Computer-aided detection performance in mammographic examination of masses: assessment.
    Gur D; Stalder JS; Hardesty LA; Zheng B; Sumkin JH; Chough DM; Shindel BE; Rockette HE
    Radiology; 2004 Nov; 233(2):418-23. PubMed ID: 15358846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Computerized analysis of multiple-mammographic views: potential usefulness of special view mammograms in computer-aided diagnosis.
    Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2001 Dec; 20(12):1285-92. PubMed ID: 11811828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance and reproducibility of a computerized mass detection scheme for digitized mammography using rotated and resampled images: an assessment.
    Zheng B; Maitz GS; Ganott MA; Abrams G; Leader JK; Gur D
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Jul; 185(1):194-8. PubMed ID: 15972422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.