These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11568467)

  • 1. Admissibility of neuropsychological testimony after Daubert and Kumho.
    Stern BH
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):93-101. PubMed ID: 11568467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Handwriting Evidence in Federal Courts - From Frye to Kumho.
    Zlotnick J; Lin JR
    Forensic Sci Rev; 2001 Jul; 13(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 26256304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An overview of neurolaw for the clinician: what every potential witness should know.
    Taylor JS
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):69-77. PubMed ID: 11568464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The roles of experts and litigation support consultants in medical-legal claims.
    Friedman HJ; Klee CH
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 11568470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Not just malingering: syndrome diagnosis in traumatic brain injury litigation.
    Miller L
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):109-22. PubMed ID: 11568469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Symptom validity testing: a critical review.
    Bianchini KJ; Mathias CW; Greve KW
    Clin Neuropsychol; 2001 Feb; 15(1):19-45. PubMed ID: 11778576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Admissibility of scientific evidence in courts.
    Davies J
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):243-57. PubMed ID: 16082863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fixed vs. flexible neuropsychological test batteries under the Daubert standard for the admissibility of scientific evidence.
    Reed JE
    Behav Sci Law; 1996; 14(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 8963383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Criterion validity of the California Verbal Learning Test-Second Edition (CVLT-II) after traumatic brain injury.
    Jacobs ML; Donders J
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Feb; 22(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 17207963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Best practice guidelines for forensic neuropsychological examinations of patients with traumatic brain injury.
    Donders J; Hanks R; Morgan J; Ricker J; Sweet J
    J Head Trauma Rehabil; 2009; 24(5):413-4; discussion 414-8, author reply 418-9. PubMed ID: 19858973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The drama of hyperextension trauma--chronic whiplash syndrome with its neuropsychological and psychiatric findings. An analysis of 80 cases from expert assessment].
    Kissel W
    Praxis (Bern 1994); 1999 Oct; 88(44):1793-802. PubMed ID: 10584549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The National Football League and chronic traumatic encephalopathy: legal implications.
    Korngold C; Farrell HM; Fozdar M
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2013; 41(3):430-6. PubMed ID: 24051597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mild traumatic brain injury: Is DTI ready for the courtroom?
    Shenton ME; Price BH; Levin L; Edersheim JG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2018; 61():50-63. PubMed ID: 30391039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-Daubert admissibility of scientific evidence on malingering of cognitive deficits.
    Vallabhajosula B; van Gorp WG
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(2):207-15. PubMed ID: 11471788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches.
    Hawkins TS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Kumho Tire Co., Ltd. v. Carmichael.
    Grudzinskas AJ
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):482-8. PubMed ID: 10509947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony.
    Merlino ML; Murray CI; Richardson JT
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18344168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Standardizing the psychological autopsy: addressing the Daubert standard.
    Snider JE; Hane S; Berman AL
    Suicide Life Threat Behav; 2006 Oct; 36(5):511-8. PubMed ID: 17087630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Psychological expert witness testimony and judicial decision making trends.
    Shapiro DL; Mixon L; Jackson M; Shook J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 42-43():149-53. PubMed ID: 26341310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.