These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11568939)

  • 1. Monitoring a clinical trial with multiple hypotheses concerning the treatment effect on a single primary endpoint.
    Denne JS; Koch GG
    Stat Med; 2001 Oct; 20(19):2801-12; discussion 2813-4. PubMed ID: 11568939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Adaptive Designs with Discrete Test Statistics and Consideration of Overrunning.
    Schmidt R; Burkhardt B; Faldum A
    Methods Inf Med; 2015; 54(5):434-46. PubMed ID: 26429500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dependence, hyper-dependence and hypothesis testing in clinical trials.
    Moyé LA; Baraniuk S
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Jan; 28(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 16857430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Constructing multiple test procedures for partially ordered hypothesis sets.
    Edwards D; Madsen J
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5116-24. PubMed ID: 17476650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiplicity adjustment for composite binary endpoints.
    Rauch G; Kieser M
    Methods Inf Med; 2012; 51(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 22525969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A reviewer's perspective on multiple endpoint issues in clinical trials.
    Huque MF; Sankoh AJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Nov; 7(4):545-64. PubMed ID: 9358328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials.
    Sankoh AJ; Huque MF; Dubey SD
    Stat Med; 1997 Nov; 16(22):2529-42. PubMed ID: 9403954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the response rates for superiority, noninferiority and equivalence testing with multiple-to-one matched binary data.
    Tsong Y; Yuan M; Dong X; Wu YT; Shen M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013; 23(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 23331224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical decisions and the interim analyses of clinical trials.
    Stanev R
    Theor Med Bioeth; 2011 Feb; 32(1):61-74. PubMed ID: 21222041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Problems raised by interim analysis in therapeutic trials].
    Rodary C; Nougue CC
    Bull Cancer; 1982; 69(4):387-92. PubMed ID: 7150794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conditional power calculations for clinical trials with historical controls.
    Korn EL; Freidlin B
    Stat Med; 2006 Sep; 25(17):2922-31. PubMed ID: 16479548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interim analyses and early termination of clinical trials.
    Choi SC
    J Biopharm Stat; 1997 Nov; 7(4):533-43. PubMed ID: 9358327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Group sequential test strategies for superiority and non-inferiority hypotheses in active controlled clinical trials.
    Wang SJ; Hung HM; Tsong Y; Cui L
    Stat Med; 2001 Jul; 20(13):1903-12. PubMed ID: 11427948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early termination of clinical trials with prolonged observation of individual patients: a case study.
    van Es GA; Tijssen JG; Lubsen J; van Strik R
    Stat Med; 1987 Dec; 6(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 3438618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Power and sample size for clinical trials when efficacy is required in multiple endpoints: application to an Alzheimer's treatment trial.
    Xiong C; Yu K; Gao F; Yan Y; Zhang Z
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(5):387-93. PubMed ID: 16317808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data monitoring in clinical trials: the case for stochastic curtailment.
    Davis BR; Hardy RJ
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1994 Sep; 47(9):1033-42. PubMed ID: 7730906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Non-inferiority trials: the 'at least as good as' criterion.
    Laster LL; Johnson MF
    Stat Med; 2003 Jan; 22(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 12520556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Adaptive clinical trial designs: ready for prime time? Proceedings of the Harvard-MIT Division of Health Science and Technology Workshop. October 2004.
    Stat Med; 2006 Oct; 25(19):3229-347. PubMed ID: 16847901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Group sequential methods for cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Zou GY; Donner A; Klar N
    Clin Trials; 2005; 2(6):479-87. PubMed ID: 16422308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A decision rule for sequential monitoring of clinical trials with a primary and supportive outcome.
    Zhao Y; Grambsch PM; Neaton JD
    Clin Trials; 2007; 4(2):140-53. PubMed ID: 17456513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.