These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
77 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11568950)
1. Graphical model checking with correlated response data. Pan W; Connett JE; Porzio GC; Weisberg S Stat Med; 2001 Oct; 20(19):2935-49. PubMed ID: 11568950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Small-sample adjustments in using the sandwich variance estimator in generalized estimating equations. Pan W; Wall MM Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1429-41. PubMed ID: 12185894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A nonparametric smoothing method for assessing GEE models with longitudinal binary data. Lin KC; Chen YJ; Shyr Y Stat Med; 2008 Sep; 27(22):4428-39. PubMed ID: 18613210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. geecure: An R-package for marginal proportional hazards mixture cure models. Niu Y; Wang X; Peng Y Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 161():115-124. PubMed ID: 29852954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the analysis of composite measures of quality in medical research. Moineddin R; Meaney C; Grunfeld E Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Apr; 26(2):633-660. PubMed ID: 25296866 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [COPD treatment by drugs]. Nafti S Rev Mal Respir; 2006 Sep; 23(4 Pt 2):10S58-10S60. PubMed ID: 17127967 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Prediction of an outcome using trajectories estimated from a linear mixed model. Maruyama N; Takahashi F; Takeuchi M J Biopharm Stat; 2009 Sep; 19(5):779-90. PubMed ID: 20183443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Application of conditional moment tests to model checking for generalized linear models. Pan W Biostatistics; 2002 Jun; 3(2):267-76. PubMed ID: 12933617 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. What can go wrong when ignoring correlation bounds in the use of generalized estimating equations. Sabo RT; Chaganty NR Stat Med; 2010 Oct; 29(24):2501-7. PubMed ID: 20690109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sample size for a two-group comparison of repeated binary measurements using GEE. Jung SH; Ahn CW Stat Med; 2005 Sep; 24(17):2583-96. PubMed ID: 16118812 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Additive mixed effect model for recurrent gap time data. Ding J; Sun L Lifetime Data Anal; 2017 Apr; 23(2):223-253. PubMed ID: 26296808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On Graphically Checking Goodness-of-fit of Binary Logistic Regression Models. Gillmann G; Minder CE Methods Inf Med; 2009; 48(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 19387509 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A note on marginalization of regression parameters from mixed models of binary outcomes. Hedeker D; du Toit SHC; Demirtas H; Gibbons RD Biometrics; 2018 Mar; 74(1):354-361. PubMed ID: 28426896 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A generalized estimating equation approach for modeling random length binary vector data. Albert PS; Follmann DA; Barnhart HX Biometrics; 1997 Sep; 53(3):1116-24. PubMed ID: 9290230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Estimating relative risks in multicenter studies with a small number of centers - which methods to use? A simulation study. Pedroza C; Truong VTT Trials; 2017 Nov; 18(1):512. PubMed ID: 29096682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the adequacy of variance function in heteroscedastic regression models. Wang L; Zhou XH Biometrics; 2007 Dec; 63(4):1218-25. PubMed ID: 17484775 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sample-size calculations for studies with correlated ordinal outcomes. Kim HY; Williamson JM; Lyles CM Stat Med; 2005 Oct; 24(19):2977-87. PubMed ID: 16149125 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Generalized estimating equation model for binary outcomes with missing covariates. Xie F; Paik MC Biometrics; 1997 Dec; 53(4):1458-66. PubMed ID: 9423260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]