These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11569365)

  • 1. Experimental study on the cement mantle in hip arthroplasty: effect of defects on the property of the materials used.
    Fognani R; Baleani M; Toni A
    Chir Organi Mov; 2000; 85(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 11569365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
    Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The effect of vacuum mixing and pre-heating the femoral component on the mechanical properties of the cement mantle.
    Baleani M; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Engels GE; Viceconti M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 20190321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing.
    Jeffers JR; Browne M; Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ; Taylor M
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1525-33. PubMed ID: 17070816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of stem insertion rate on the porosity of the cement mantle of hip joint replacements.
    Baleani M; Fognani R; Toni A
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12807160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Why would cement porosity reduction be clinically irrelevant, while experimental data show the contrary.
    Janssen D; Stolk J; Verdonschot N
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jul; 23(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 16022978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface.
    Bishop NE; Ferguson S; Tepic S
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 May; 78(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 8636165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
    Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
    J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
    Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
    Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Extensive porosity at the cement-femoral prosthesis interface: a preliminary study.
    James SP; Schmalzried TP; McGarry FJ; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Jan; 27(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 8421001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: a cadaver model with simulated blood flow.
    Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA; Higham PA
    Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):607-16. PubMed ID: 16929438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cement mantle stress under retroversion torque at heel-strike.
    Afsharpoya B; Barton DC; Fisher J; Purbach B; Wroblewski M; Stewart TD
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1323-30. PubMed ID: 19879794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Porosity of neat and composite bone cement mantles.
    Hansen CL; McQueen DA; Friis EA; Cooke FW; Widenhouse CW
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Feb; 23(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 18280425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
    O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
    J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Computational assessment of the effect of polyethylene wear rate, mantle thickness, and porosity on the mechanical failure of the acetabular cement mantle.
    Coultrup OJ; Hunt C; Wroblewski BM; Taylor M
    J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19950359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing.
    Little JP; Gray HA; Murray DW; Beard DJ; Gill HS
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):454-8. PubMed ID: 18358388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Increased long-term failure risk associated with excessively thin cement mantle in cemented hip arthroplasty: a comparative in vitro study.
    Cristofolini L; Erani P; Savigni P; Grupp T; Thies O; Viceconti M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol); 2007 May; 22(4):410-21. PubMed ID: 17275149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
    Ramos A; Simões JA
    J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.