98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11569365)
1. Experimental study on the cement mantle in hip arthroplasty: effect of defects on the property of the materials used.
Fognani R; Baleani M; Toni A
Chir Organi Mov; 2000; 85(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 11569365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of vacuum mixing and pre-heating the femoral component on the mechanical properties of the cement mantle.
Baleani M; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Engels GE; Viceconti M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 20190321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing.
Jeffers JR; Browne M; Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ; Taylor M
J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1525-33. PubMed ID: 17070816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The influence of stem insertion rate on the porosity of the cement mantle of hip joint replacements.
Baleani M; Fognani R; Toni A
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(3):199-205. PubMed ID: 12807160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Why would cement porosity reduction be clinically irrelevant, while experimental data show the contrary.
Janssen D; Stolk J; Verdonschot N
J Orthop Res; 2005 Jul; 23(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 16022978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Porosity reduction in bone cement at the cement-stem interface.
Bishop NE; Ferguson S; Tepic S
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1996 May; 78(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 8636165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Measurement of transient and residual stresses during polymerization of bone cement for cemented hip implants.
Nuño N; Madrala A; Plamondon D
J Biomech; 2008 Aug; 41(12):2605-11. PubMed ID: 18692188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro interface and cement mantle analysis of different femur stem designs.
Gravius S; Wirtz DC; Siebert CH; Andereya S; Mueller-Rath R; Maus U; Mumme T
J Biomech; 2008; 41(9):2021-8. PubMed ID: 18514207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Influence of proximal stem geometry and stem-cement interface characteristics on bone and cement stresses in femoral hip arthroplasty: finite element analysis].
Massin P; Astoin E; Lavaste F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2003 Apr; 89(2):134-43. PubMed ID: 12844057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Extensive porosity at the cement-femoral prosthesis interface: a preliminary study.
James SP; Schmalzried TP; McGarry FJ; Harris WH
J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Jan; 27(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 8421001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of low-viscosity cement on mantle morphology and femoral stem micromotion: a cadaver model with simulated blood flow.
Race A; Miller MA; Clarke MT; Mann KA; Higham PA
Acta Orthop; 2006 Aug; 77(4):607-16. PubMed ID: 16929438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cement mantle stress under retroversion torque at heel-strike.
Afsharpoya B; Barton DC; Fisher J; Purbach B; Wroblewski M; Stewart TD
Med Eng Phys; 2009 Dec; 31(10):1323-30. PubMed ID: 19879794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Porosity of neat and composite bone cement mantles.
Hansen CL; McQueen DA; Friis EA; Cooke FW; Widenhouse CW
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Feb; 23(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 18280425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro measurement of strain in the bone cement surrounding the femoral component of total hip replacements during simulated gait and stair-climbing.
O'Connor DO; Burke DW; Jasty M; Sedlacek RC; Harris WH
J Orthop Res; 1996 Sep; 14(5):769-77. PubMed ID: 8893771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computational assessment of the effect of polyethylene wear rate, mantle thickness, and porosity on the mechanical failure of the acetabular cement mantle.
Coultrup OJ; Hunt C; Wroblewski BM; Taylor M
J Orthop Res; 2010 May; 28(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 19950359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing.
Little JP; Gray HA; Murray DW; Beard DJ; Gill HS
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):454-8. PubMed ID: 18358388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Increased long-term failure risk associated with excessively thin cement mantle in cemented hip arthroplasty: a comparative in vitro study.
Cristofolini L; Erani P; Savigni P; Grupp T; Thies O; Viceconti M
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 May; 22(4):410-21. PubMed ID: 17275149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of cement mantle thickness and stem geometry on fatigue damage in two different cemented hip femoral prostheses.
Ramos A; Simões JA
J Biomech; 2009 Nov; 42(15):2602-10. PubMed ID: 19660758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
