387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11569422)
41. Anti-Müllerian hormone levels in salpingectomized compared with nonsalpingectomized women with tubal factor infertility and women with unexplained infertility.
Grynnerup AG; Lindhard A; Sørensen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2013 Nov; 92(11):1297-303. PubMed ID: 24032634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Hydrosalpinx - Salpingostomy, salpingectomy or tubal occlusion.
Ng KYB; Cheong Y
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2019 Aug; 59():41-47. PubMed ID: 30824209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Salpingectomy increases peri-implantation endometrial HOXA10 expression in women with hydrosalpinx.
Daftary GS; Kayisli U; Seli E; Bukulmez O; Arici A; Taylor HS
Fertil Steril; 2007 Feb; 87(2):367-72. PubMed ID: 17173899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Management of hydrosalpinx before IVF: a literature review.
D'Arpe S; Franceschetti S; Caccetta J; Pietrangeli D; Muzii L; Panici PB
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015; 35(6):547-50. PubMed ID: 25436898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Is the outcome of in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer treatment improved by spontaneous or surgical drainage of a hydrosalpinx?
Sowter MC; Akande VA; Williams JA; Hull MG
Hum Reprod; 1997 Oct; 12(10):2147-50. PubMed ID: 9402271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Surgical treatment for tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation.
Johnson NP; Mak W; Sowter MC
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2004; (3):CD002125. PubMed ID: 15266464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Tubal ectopic pregnancy after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: a role for proximal occlusion or salpingectomy after failed distal tubal surgery?
Zouves C; Erenus M; Gomel V
Fertil Steril; 1991 Oct; 56(4):691-5. PubMed ID: 1915944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Salpingectomy improves the pregnancy rate in in-vitro fertilization patients with hydrosalpinx.
Shelton KE; Butler L; Toner JP; Oehninger S; Muasher SJ
Hum Reprod; 1996 Mar; 11(3):523-5. PubMed ID: 8671258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Management of hydrosalpinx: reconstructive surgery or IVF?
Bontis JN; Dinas KD
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2000; 900():260-71. PubMed ID: 10818414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Essure a novel option for the treatment of hydrosalpinx: a case series and literature review.
Lorente González J; Ríos Castillo JE; Pomares Toro E; Romero Nieto MI; Castelo-Branco C; Arjona Berral JE
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2016; 32(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 26513546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [[Hydrosalpinx and fertilization in vitro-embryo transfer: abstention or salpingectomy? Salpingectomy, yes but when and for whom?].
Dechaud H
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2001 Jun; 29(6):473-4. PubMed ID: 11462968
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. Hysteroscopic tubal electrocoagulation versus laparoscopic tubal ligation for patients with hydrosalpinges undergoing in vitro fertilization.
El-Mazny A; Abou-Salem N; Hammam M; Saber W
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Sep; 130(3):250-2. PubMed ID: 26140948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Only hydrosalpinges visible on ultrasound are associated with reduced implantation and pregnancy rates after in-vitro fertilization.
de Wit W; Gowrising CJ; Kuik DJ; Lens JW; Schats R
Hum Reprod; 1998 Jun; 13(6):1696-701. PubMed ID: 9688415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Hydrosalpinx: Tubal surgery or in vitro fertilisation? An everlasting dilemma nowadays; a narrative review.
Daniilidis A; Balaouras D; Chitzios D; Theodoridis T; Assimakopoulos E
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2017 Jul; 37(5):550-556. PubMed ID: 28325120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Does salpingectomy affect the ipsilateral ovarian response to gonadotropin during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles?
Orvieto R; Saar-Ryss B; Morgante G; Gemer O; Anteby EY; Meltcer S
Fertil Steril; 2011 Apr; 95(5):1842-4. PubMed ID: 21185019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Impact of endometriosis on implantation. Data from the Wilford Hall Medical Center IVF-ET Program.
Hickman TN
J Reprod Med; 2002 Oct; 47(10):801-8. PubMed ID: 12418061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of the ongoing pregnancy rate of in vitro fertilisation following tubal occlusion by microcoil placement versus laparoscopic tubal ligation for hydrosalpinges.
Chen ZQ; Ng EHY; Chen MX; Zhao M; Pan JP; Chen H; Teng XM
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2022 Feb; 25(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 31833424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Salpingectomy and proximal tubal occlusion for hydrosalpinx prior to in vitro fertilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Zhang Y; Sun Y; Guo Y; Li TC; Duan H
Obstet Gynecol Surv; 2015 Jan; 70(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 25616345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Does hydrosalpinx reduce the pregnancy rate after in vitro fertilization?
Wainer R; Camus E; Camier B; Martin C; Vasseur C; Merlet F
Fertil Steril; 1997 Dec; 68(6):1022-6. PubMed ID: 9418691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. An increased number of replaced embryos counteracts the adverse effect of hydrosalpinges on IVF/ET outcome.
Abd-el-Maeboud KH; al-Dein M Khalifa E; el-Hussein ES
J Assist Reprod Genet; 1998 Jan; 15(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 9493062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
