These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11569661)
1. An ART field study in western Nepal. Yee R Int Dent J; 2001 Apr; 51(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 11569661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical investigation of two glass-ionomer restoratives used with the atraumatic restorative treatment approach in China: two-years results. Lo EC; Luo Y; Fan MW; Wei SH Caries Res; 2001; 35(6):458-63. PubMed ID: 11799287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of atraumatic restorative treatment and conventional restorative procedures in a hospital clinic: evaluation after 30 months. Gao W; Peng D; Smales RJ; Yip KH Quintessence Int; 2003 Jan; 34(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 12674356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-year evaluation of atraumatic restorative treatment and minimum intervention techniques on primary teeth. Louw AJ; Sarvan I; Chikte UM; Honkala E SADJ; 2002 Sep; 57(9):366-71. PubMed ID: 12494713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Class V lesions restored with four different tooth-colored materials--3-year results. Folwaczny M; Loher C; Mehl A; Kunzelmann KH; Hickel R Clin Oral Investig; 2001 Mar; 5(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 11355096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Frencken JE; Makoni F; Sithole WD Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Dec; 26(6):372-81. PubMed ID: 9870536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Survival of multiple-surface ART restorations using a zinc-reinforced glass-ionomer restorative after 2 years: A randomized triple-blind clinical trial. Mobarak E; El-Deeb H; Daifalla LE; Ghaly M; Mustafa M; Sabry D; Fatah H; Mulder J; Creugers NHJ; Frencken JE Dent Mater; 2019 Sep; 35(9):e185-e192. PubMed ID: 31235189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical evaluation of paired compomer and glass ionomer restorations in primary molars: final results after 42 months. Welbury RR; Shaw AJ; Murray JJ; Gordon PH; McCabe JF Br Dent J; 2000 Jul; 189(2):93-7. PubMed ID: 10975160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results. Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical performance of resin-modified glass ionomer cement restorations in primary teeth. A retrospective evaluation. Croll TP; Bar-Zion Y; Segura A; Donly KJ J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1110-6. PubMed ID: 11575018 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of two cavity preparation methods on the longevity of glass ionomer cement restorations: an evaluation after 12 months. Yip KH; Smales RJ; Gao W; Peng D J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Jun; 133(6):744-51; quiz 769. PubMed ID: 12085859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Restoration of permanent teeth in young rural children in Cambodia using the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique and Fuji II glass ionomer cement. Mallow PK; Durward CS; Klaipo M Int J Paediatr Dent; 1998 Mar; 8(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 9558544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A clinical evaluation of two glass ionomer cements in primary molars using atraumatic restorative treatment technique in India: 1 year follow up. Deepa G; Shobha T Int J Paediatr Dent; 2010 Nov; 20(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 20642467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical investigation of a high-strength glass ionomer restorative used with the ART technique in Wuhan, China: one-year results. Luo Y; Wei SH; Fan MW; Lo EC Chin J Dent Res; 1999 Dec; 2(3-4):73-8. PubMed ID: 10863422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Eight-year study on conventional glass ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth. Qvist V; Laurberg L; Poulsen A; Teglers PT Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 15124781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of composite and compomer restorations in primary teeth: 24-month results. Pascon FM; Kantovitz KR; Caldo-Teixeira AS; Borges AF; Silva TN; Puppin-Rontani RM; Garcia-Godoy F J Dent; 2006 Jul; 34(6):381-8. PubMed ID: 16242232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A 2-year clinical study of two glass ionomer cements used in the atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) technique. Ho TF; Smales RJ; Fang DT Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1999 Jun; 27(3):195-201. PubMed ID: 10385357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison between restorations in the permanent dentition produced by hand and rotary instrumentation--survival after 3 years. Taifour D; Frencken JE; Beiruti N; van't Hof MA; Truin GJ; van Palenstein Helderman WH Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 31(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 12641593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Retrospective Study of the 3-Year Survival Rate of Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Class II Restorations in Primary Molars. Webman M; Mulki E; Roldan R; Arevalo O; Roberts JF; Garcia-Godoy F J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 26696100 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Class II restorations with a polyacid-modified composite resin in primary molars placed in a dental practice: results of a two-year clinical evaluation. Attin T; Opatowski A; Meyer C; Zingg-Meyer B; Mönting JS Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):259-64. PubMed ID: 11203828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]