363 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11570022)
1. A randomized intervention to improve ongoing participation in mammography.
Barr JK; Franks AL; Lee NC; Antonucci DM; Rifkind S; Schachter M
Am J Manag Care; 2001 Sep; 7(9):887-94. PubMed ID: 11570022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; Menon U; Daggy J
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Oct; 13(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 15671706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cost effectiveness of 5 interventions to increase mammography adherence in a managed care population.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Zollinger TW; Maraj M; Skinner CS; Zoppi KA; Muegge CM
Am J Manag Care; 2003 Jan; 9(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 12549813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of three methods for improving mammography rates in a managed care plan.
Davis NA; Nash E; Bailey C; Lewis MJ; Rimer BK; Koplan JP
Am J Prev Med; 1997; 13(4):298-302. PubMed ID: 9236968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Chaudhry R; Scheitel SM; McMurtry EK; Leutink DJ; Cabanela RL; Naessens JM; Rahman AS; Davis LA; Stroebel RJ
Arch Intern Med; 2007 Mar; 167(6):606-11. PubMed ID: 17389293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Factors associated with continued participation in mammography screening.
Barr JK; Franks AL; Lee NC; Herther P; Schachter M
Prev Med; 2001 Dec; 33(6):661-7. PubMed ID: 11716664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Randomized controlled trial of a repeat mammography intervention: effect of adherence definitions on results.
Partin MR; Slater JS; Caplan L
Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):734-40. PubMed ID: 16043216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening mammography use: the importance of a population perspective.
McCarthy BD; Yood MU; MacWilliam CH; Lee MJ
Am J Prev Med; 1996; 12(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 8777073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Enhancing compliance with screening mammography recommendations: a clinical trial in a primary care office.
Mohler PJ
Fam Med; 1995 Feb; 27(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 7737444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-effectiveness comparison of five interventions to increase mammography screening.
Saywell RM; Champion VL; Skinner CS; McQuillen D; Martin D; Maraj M
Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 29(5):374-82. PubMed ID: 10564629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women.
Crane LA; Leakey TA; Ehrsam G; Rimer BK; Warnecke RB
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Sep; 9(9):923-31. PubMed ID: 11008910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of patient and provider reminders on mammography and Papanicolaou smear screening in a large health maintenance organization.
Somkin CP; Hiatt RA; Hurley LB; Gruskin E; Ackerson L; Larson P
Arch Intern Med; 1997 Aug 11-25; 157(15):1658-64. PubMed ID: 9250226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of patient reminder letters to promote cancer screening services in women: A population-based study in Wisconsin.
Reeves MJ; Remington PL
Prev Med; 1999 Sep; 29(3):202-9. PubMed ID: 10479608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Telephone reminders increase re-screening in a county breast screening program.
Goel A; George J; Burack RC
J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2008 May; 19(2):512-21. PubMed ID: 18469422
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The safety net: a cost-effective approach to improving breast and cervical cancer screening.
Vogt TM; Glass A; Glasgow RE; La Chance PA; Lichtenstein E
J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2003 Oct; 12(8):789-98. PubMed ID: 14588129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. On-schedule mammography rescreening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
Bobo JK; Shapiro JA; Schulman J; Wolters CL
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Apr; 13(4):620-30. PubMed ID: 15066928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interventions targeted toward patients to increase mammography use.
Yabroff KR; Mandelblatt JS
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1999 Sep; 8(9):749-57. PubMed ID: 10498393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of direct mail as a population-based strategy to increase mammography use among low-income underinsured women ages 40 to 64 years.
Slater JS; Henly GA; Ha CN; Malone ME; Nyman JA; Diaz S; McGovern PG
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Oct; 14(10):2346-52. PubMed ID: 16214915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Overuse of mammography during the first round of an organized breast cancer screening programme.
Chamot E; Charvet A; Perneger TV
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Aug; 15(4):620-5. PubMed ID: 19522725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
