These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11570685)

  • 1. Influence of rubber-dam on the reconstruction of proximal contacts with adhesive tooth-colored restorations.
    Dörfer CE; Schriever A; Heidemann D; Staehle HJ; Pioch T
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(2):169-75. PubMed ID: 11570685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of the rubber dam on proximal contact strengths.
    Rau PJ; Pioch T; Staehle HJ; Dörfer CE
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 16827018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of stresses in molar teeth restored with inlays and direct restorations, including polymerization shrinkage of composite resin and tooth loading during mastication.
    Dejak B; Młotkowski A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Mar; 31(3):e77-87. PubMed ID: 25544104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Duplicating the form and function of posterior teeth with Class II resin-based composite.
    Christensen JJ
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):104-8; quiz 109-10. PubMed ID: 22414503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlling contacts and contours using preformed ceramic inserts.
    Liebenberg WH
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2000 Feb; 21(2):147-50, 152, 154-6 passim; quiz 168. PubMed ID: 11199695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro evaluation of push-out bond strength of direct ceramic inlays to tooth surface with fiber-reinforced composite at the interface.
    Cekic I; Ergun G; Uctasli S; Lassila LV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 May; 97(5):271-8. PubMed ID: 17547945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resin composite contours.
    Sidelsky H
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):395-401. PubMed ID: 20448605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fatigue load of teeth restored with bonded direct composite and indirect ceramic inlays in MOD class II cavity preparations.
    Shor A; Nicholls JI; Phillips KM; Libman WJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 12675458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-year clinical performance of a compomer in stress-bearing restorations in permanent posterior teeth.
    Huth KC; Manhard J; Hickel R; Kunzelmann KH
    Am J Dent; 2003 Aug; 16(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 14579881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
    Rada RE
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Direct options for tooth-colored restorations.
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 20(3):162-4. PubMed ID: 18567484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Structural optimization of dental restorations using the principle of adaptive growth.
    Couegnat G; Fok SL; Cooper JE; Qualtrough AJ
    Dent Mater; 2006 Jan; 22(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 16061281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of proximal contacts of posterior composite restorations with 4 placement techniques.
    El-Badrawy WA; Leung BW; El-Mowafy O; Rubo JH; Rubo MH
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2003 Mar; 69(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 12622881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars.
    Dejak B; Mlotkowski A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 18262014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphological analysis of proximal contacts in class II direct restorations with 3D image reconstruction.
    Chuang SF; Su KC; Wang CH; Chang CH
    J Dent; 2011 Jun; 39(6):448-56. PubMed ID: 21504778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations.
    Prakki A; Cilli R; Saad JO; Rodrigues JR
    Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):785-9. PubMed ID: 15553286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Controversies in posterior composite resin restorations.
    Wilson EG; Mandradjieff M; Brindock T
    Dent Clin North Am; 1990 Jan; 34(1):27-44. PubMed ID: 2403943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of the isolation method on the 10-year clinical behaviour of posterior resin composite restorations.
    Raskin A; Setcos JC; Vreven J; Wilson NH
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):148-52. PubMed ID: 11000319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Indirect posterior restorations using a new chairside microhybrid resin composite system.
    Tay FR; Wei SH
    J Adhes Dent; 2001; 3(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 11317389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Teaching of direct posterior resin composite restorations in UK dental therapy training programmes.
    Lynch CD; Wilson NH
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):415-21. PubMed ID: 20448613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.