108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11571543)
1. Detection of simulated internal tooth resorption using conventional radiography and subtraction imaging.
Holmes JP; Gulabivala K; van der Stelt PF
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Sep; 30(5):249-54. PubMed ID: 11571543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative analysis of apical root resorption by means of digital subtraction radiography.
Heo MS; Lee SS; Lee KH; Choi HM; Choi SC; Park TW
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Mar; 91(3):369-73. PubMed ID: 11250638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of simulated internal resorption cavities using digital and digital subtraction radiography: a comparative study.
Stephanopoulos G; Mikrogeorgis G; Lyroudia K
Dent Traumatol; 2011 Oct; 27(5):344-9. PubMed ID: 21762378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT images of different voxel resolutions used to detect simulated small internal resorption cavities.
Kamburoğlu K; Kursun S
Int Endod J; 2010 Sep; 43(9):798-807. PubMed ID: 20609023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of simulated external root resorptions with digital radiography and digital subtraction radiography.
Ono E; Medici Filho E; Faig Leite H; Tanaka JL; De Moraes ME; De Melo Castilho JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):324-33. PubMed ID: 21392686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of conventional film with different digital and digitally filtered images in the detection of simulated internal resorption cavities--an ex vivo study in human cadaver jaws.
Kamburoğlu K; Barenboim SF; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):790-7. PubMed ID: 17942339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of endodontic files in digital radiographs before and after employing three image processing algorithms.
Li G; Sanderink GC; Welander U; McDavid WD; Näsström K
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jan; 33(1):6-11. PubMed ID: 15140815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital subtraction radiography for assessment of simulated root resorption cavities. Performance of conventional and reverse contrast modes.
Hintze H; Wenzel A; Andreasen FM; Swerin I
Endod Dent Traumatol; 1992 Aug; 8(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 1291302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between two tomographic sections in the diagnosis of external root resorption.
Lermen CA; Liedke GS; da Silveira HE; da Silveira HL; Mazzola AA; de Figueiredo JA
J Appl Oral Sci; 2010; 18(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 20857012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy and reproducibility of conventional radiographic assessment and subtraction radiography in detecting demineralization in occlusal surfaces.
Ricketts DN; Ekstrand KR; Martignon S; Ellwood R; Alatsaris M; Nugent Z
Caries Res; 2007; 41(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 17284913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of external root resorption using digital subtraction radiography.
Kravitz LH; Tyndall DA; Bagnell CP; Dove SB
J Endod; 1992 Jun; 18(6):275-84. PubMed ID: 1402585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of apical root resorption using digital reconstruction.
Reukers E; Sanderink G; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM; van't Hof M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 9482019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of panoramic radiography and panoramic digital subtraction radiography in the detection of simulated osteophytic lesions of the mandibular condyle.
Masood F; Katz JO; Hardman PK; Glaros AG; Spencer P
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2002 May; 93(5):626-31. PubMed ID: 12075216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy in detecting bone lesions in vitro with conventional and subtracted direct digital imaging.
Stassinakis A; Brägger U; Stojanovic M; Bürgin W; Lussi A; Lang NP
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):232-7. PubMed ID: 9161167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radiographic evaluation of the effect of orthodontic retraction on the root of the maxillary canine.
Perona G; Wenzel A
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Sep; 25(4):179-85. PubMed ID: 9084270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnosis of artificially induced external root resorption using conventional intraoral film radiography, CCD, and PSP: an ex vivo study.
Kamburoğlu K; Tsesis I; Kfir A; Kaffe I
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Dec; 106(6):885-91. PubMed ID: 18547837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conventional and digital radiographic methods in the detection of simulated external root resorptions: a comparative study.
Westphalen VP; Gomes de Moraes I; Westphalen FH; Martins WD; Souza PH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 15533976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of observer performance in determining the position of endodontic files with physical measures in the evaluation of dental X-ray imaging systems.
Vandre RH; Pajak JC; Abdel-Nabi H; Farman TT; Farman AG
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jul; 29(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 10918454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
