328 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11571598)
1. Validity and reproducibility of ultrasonography for the measurement of intra-abdominal adipose tissue.
Stolk RP; Wink O; Zelissen PM; Meijer R; van Gils AP; Grobbee DE
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1346-51. PubMed ID: 11571598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Anthropometric or ultrasonic measurements in assessment of visceral fat? A comparative study.
Tornaghi G; Raiteri R; Pozzato C; Rispoli A; Bramani M; Cipolat M; Craveri A
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1994 Nov; 18(11):771-5. PubMed ID: 7866479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [An assessment of abdominal fatty tissue distribution in obese children. A comparison between echography and computed tomography].
Ferrozzi F; Zuccoli G; Tognini G; Castriota-Scanderbeg A; Bacchini E; Bernasconi S; Campani R
Radiol Med; 1999 Dec; 98(6):490-4. PubMed ID: 10755010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measured and predicted total and visceral adipose tissue in women. Correlations with metabolic parameters.
Armellini F; Zamboni M; Castelli S; Micciolo R; Mino A; Turcato E; Rigo L; Bergamo-Andreis IA; Bosello O
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1994 Sep; 18(9):641-7. PubMed ID: 7812419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of visceral adipose in abdominal obesity and its clinical application].
Pu YF; He HB; Zhao ZG; Chen J; Ni YX; Zhong J; Liu HY; Yan ZC; Zhu ZM
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Sep; 88(34):2391-4. PubMed ID: 19087712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Methods of estimation of visceral fat: advantages of ultrasonography.
Ribeiro-Filho FF; Faria AN; Azjen S; Zanella MT; Ferreira SR
Obes Res; 2003 Dec; 11(12):1488-94. PubMed ID: 14694213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Total and intra-abdominal fat measurements by ultrasound and computerized tomography.
Armellini F; Zamboni M; Robbi R; Todesco T; Rigo L; Bergamo-Andreis IA; Bosello O
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1993 Apr; 17(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 8387970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Interindividual variation in abdominal subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: influence of measurement site.
Lee S; Janssen I; Ross R
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2004 Sep; 97(3):948-54. PubMed ID: 15121737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Sonography detection of small intra-abdominal fat variations.
Armellini F; Zamboni M; Rigo L; Bergamo-Andreis IA; Robbi R; De Marchi M; Bosello O
Int J Obes; 1991 Dec; 15(12):847-52. PubMed ID: 1794927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Is echography an adequate method for assessing the thickness of intra-abdominal fat? A comparison with computed tomography].
Cucchi E; Piatti PM; Orena C; Pontiroli AE; Martino E; Paesano PL; Pozza G; Del Maschio A
Radiol Med; 1997 Oct; 94(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 9465239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonography and anthropometry for measuring regional body fat in HIV-infected patients.
Padilla S; Gallego JA; Masiá M; Ardoy F; Hernández I; Gutiérrez F
Curr HIV Res; 2007 Sep; 5(5):459-66. PubMed ID: 17896965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reliability of B-mode ultrasonic measurements of subcutaneous adipose tissue and intra-abdominal depth: comparisons with skinfold thicknesses.
Bellisari A; Roche AF; Siervogel RM
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1993 Aug; 17(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 8401751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of ultrasonographic and anthropometric methods to assess body fat in childhood obesity.
Semiz S; Ozgören E; Sabir N
Int J Obes (Lond); 2007 Jan; 31(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 16788571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Sonographic assessment of changes in thickness of different abdominal fat layers in response to diet in obese women.
Sabir N; Pakdemirli E; Sermez Y; Zencir M; Kazil S
J Clin Ultrasound; 2003 Jan; 31(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 12478649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-abdominal adipose tissue in young children.
Goran MI; Kaskoun M; Shuman WP
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1995 Apr; 19(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 7627253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel method of measuring intra-abdominal fat volume using helical computed tomography.
Kobayashi J; Tadokoro N; Watanabe M; Shinomiya M
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2002 Mar; 26(3):398-402. PubMed ID: 11896496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sonographic measurement of mesenteric fat thickness is a good correlate with cardiovascular risk factors: comparison with subcutaneous and preperitoneal fat thickness, magnetic resonance imaging and anthropometric indexes.
Liu KH; Chan YL; Chan WB; Kong WL; Kong MO; Chan JC
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2003 Oct; 27(10):1267-73. PubMed ID: 14513076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Variability of abdominal adipose tissue measurements using computed tomography in prepubertal girls.
Figueroa-Colon R; Mayo MS; Treuth MS; Aldridge RA; Hunter GR; Berland L; Goran MI; Weinsier RL
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 1998 Oct; 22(10):1019-23. PubMed ID: 9806318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Correlation of fat distribution in whole body MRI with generally used anthropometric data.
Ludescher B; Machann J; Eschweiler GW; Vanhöfen S; Maenz C; Thamer C; Claussen CD; Schick F
Invest Radiol; 2009 Nov; 44(11):712-9. PubMed ID: 19809346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A minipig model of body adipose tissue distribution.
Weingand KW; Hartke GT; Noordsy TW; Ledeboer DA
Int J Obes; 1989; 13(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 2670792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
