200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11571891)
1. Glucksberg, the putative right to adequate pain relief, and death with dignity.
Cantor NL
J Health Law; 2001; 34(3):301-33. PubMed ID: 11571891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Too many physicians: physician-assisted suicide after Glucksberg/Quill.
Pratt DA
Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1999; 9():E1-E67. PubMed ID: 16528815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Foreword: can Glucksberg survive Lawrence? Another look at the end of life and personal autonomy.
Kamisar Y
Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1453-78. PubMed ID: 18595210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Terminal sedation: palliative care for intractable pain, post Glucksberg and Quill.
McStay R
Am J Law Med; 2003; 29(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 12953318
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Deciding life and death in the courtroom. From Quinlan to Cruzan, Glucksberg, and Vacco--a brief history and analysis of constitutional protection of the 'right to die'.
Gostin LO
JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(18):1523-8. PubMed ID: 9363974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Washington v. Glucksberg.
Coleson RE
Issues Law Med; 1997; 13(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 9479884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Washington v. Glucksberg was tragically wrong.
Chemerinsky E
Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1501-16. PubMed ID: 18595212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. US Supreme Court confronts 'right to die'.
Carolan B
Med Leg J; 1998; 66 ( Pt 2)():65-9. PubMed ID: 9717364
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The quiet battle for the heart of liberty--a victory for the cautious: Washington v. Glucksberg, 117 S. Ct. 2258 (1997).
Melchoir JA
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1998; 66(4):1359-86. PubMed ID: 16211745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court speaks--not assisted suicide but a constitutional right to palliative care.
Burt RA
N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(17):1234-6. PubMed ID: 9337388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The law regarding assisted dying for the terminally ill in the UK.
Dimond B
Int J Palliat Nurs; 2005 Nov; 11(11):582-3; discussion 584. PubMed ID: 16471045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does it make clinical sense to equate terminally ill patients who require life-sustaining interventions with those who do not?
Alpers A; Lo B
JAMA; 1997 Jun; 277(21):1705-8. PubMed ID: 9169898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Thwarting assisted suicide threatens palliative care.
Meisel A
Med Ethics (Burlingt Mass); 2003; 10(1):4, 8. PubMed ID: 16175723
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reading the mystery passage narrowly: a legal, ethical and practical argument against physician assisted suicide.
Hickey MB
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):567-603. PubMed ID: 12755094
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond Washington v. Glucksberg: Oregon's Death with Dignity Act analyzed from medical and constitutional perspectives.
Datlof SB
J Law Health; 1999-2000; 14(1):23-44. PubMed ID: 11187366
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The state's unqualified interest in preserving life: a critique of the formulations of life's sanctity in Washington v. Glucksberg.
Staihar S
Ida Law Rev; 1998; 34(2):401-33. PubMed ID: 16086500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Physician-assisted suicide: the Supreme Court's wary rejection.
Bourguignon HJ; Martyn SR
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 2000; 31(2):253-72. PubMed ID: 12625320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The death with dignity movement: protecting rights and expanding options after Glucksberg and Quill.
Tucker KL
Minn Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 82(4):923-38. PubMed ID: 11865916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Doctor at center of Supreme Court case on assisted suicide.
Gross J
N Y Times Web; 1997 Jan; ():B1, B4. PubMed ID: 11647239
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dealing with death.
Noonan JT
Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 12755087
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
