These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11571891)
1. Glucksberg, the putative right to adequate pain relief, and death with dignity. Cantor NL J Health Law; 2001; 34(3):301-33. PubMed ID: 11571891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Too many physicians: physician-assisted suicide after Glucksberg/Quill. Pratt DA Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1999; 9():E1-E67. PubMed ID: 16528815 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Foreword: can Glucksberg survive Lawrence? Another look at the end of life and personal autonomy. Kamisar Y Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1453-78. PubMed ID: 18595210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Terminal sedation: palliative care for intractable pain, post Glucksberg and Quill. McStay R Am J Law Med; 2003; 29(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 12953318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Deciding life and death in the courtroom. From Quinlan to Cruzan, Glucksberg, and Vacco--a brief history and analysis of constitutional protection of the 'right to die'. Gostin LO JAMA; 1997 Nov; 278(18):1523-8. PubMed ID: 9363974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Washington v. Glucksberg. Coleson RE Issues Law Med; 1997; 13(3):315-21. PubMed ID: 9479884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Washington v. Glucksberg was tragically wrong. Chemerinsky E Mich Law Rev; 2008 Jun; 106(8):1501-16. PubMed ID: 18595212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. US Supreme Court confronts 'right to die'. Carolan B Med Leg J; 1998; 66 ( Pt 2)():65-9. PubMed ID: 9717364 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The quiet battle for the heart of liberty--a victory for the cautious: Washington v. Glucksberg, 117 S. Ct. 2258 (1997). Melchoir JA Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1998; 66(4):1359-86. PubMed ID: 16211745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Supreme Court speaks--not assisted suicide but a constitutional right to palliative care. Burt RA N Engl J Med; 1997 Oct; 337(17):1234-6. PubMed ID: 9337388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The law regarding assisted dying for the terminally ill in the UK. Dimond B Int J Palliat Nurs; 2005 Nov; 11(11):582-3; discussion 584. PubMed ID: 16471045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does it make clinical sense to equate terminally ill patients who require life-sustaining interventions with those who do not? Alpers A; Lo B JAMA; 1997 Jun; 277(21):1705-8. PubMed ID: 9169898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reading the mystery passage narrowly: a legal, ethical and practical argument against physician assisted suicide. Hickey MB Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):567-603. PubMed ID: 12755094 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond Washington v. Glucksberg: Oregon's Death with Dignity Act analyzed from medical and constitutional perspectives. Datlof SB J Law Health; 1999-2000; 14(1):23-44. PubMed ID: 11187366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The state's unqualified interest in preserving life: a critique of the formulations of life's sanctity in Washington v. Glucksberg. Staihar S Ida Law Rev; 1998; 34(2):401-33. PubMed ID: 16086500 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Physician-assisted suicide: the Supreme Court's wary rejection. Bourguignon HJ; Martyn SR Univ Toledo Law Rev; 2000; 31(2):253-72. PubMed ID: 12625320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The death with dignity movement: protecting rights and expanding options after Glucksberg and Quill. Tucker KL Minn Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 82(4):923-38. PubMed ID: 11865916 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Doctor at center of Supreme Court case on assisted suicide. Gross J N Y Times Web; 1997 Jan; ():B1, B4. PubMed ID: 11647239 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Dealing with death. Noonan JT Notre Dame J Law Ethics Public Policy; 1999; 12(2):387-400. PubMed ID: 12755087 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]