These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11572377)

  • 1. Use of a dual-pulse lithotripter to generate a localized and intensified cavitation field.
    Sokolov DL; Bailey MR; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Sep; 110(3 Pt 1):1685-95. PubMed ID: 11572377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A dual passive cavitation detector for localized detection of lithotripsy-induced cavitation in vitro.
    Cleveland RO; Sapozhnikov OA; Bailey MR; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1745-58. PubMed ID: 10738826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Focused Ultrasound and Lithotripsy.
    Ikeda T; Yoshizawa S; Koizumi N; Mitsuishi M; Matsumoto Y
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 880():113-29. PubMed ID: 26486335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of electrohydraulic lithotripters with rigid and pressure-release ellipsoidal reflectors. II. Cavitation fields.
    Bailey MR; Blackstock DT; Cleveland RO; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):1149-60. PubMed ID: 10462818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Controlled, forced collapse of cavitation bubbles for improved stone fragmentation during shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zhong P; Cocks FH; Cioanta I; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 1997 Dec; 158(6):2323-8. PubMed ID: 9366384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inertial cavitation and associated acoustic emission produced during electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripsy.
    Zhong P; Cioanta I; Cocks FH; Preminger GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 May; 101(5 Pt 1):2940-50. PubMed ID: 9165740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of overpressure and pulse repetition frequency on cavitation in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Sapozhnikov OA; Khokhlova VA; Bailey MR; Williams JC; McAteer JA; Cleveland RO; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1183-95. PubMed ID: 12243163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantitative measurements of acoustic emissions from cavitation at the surface of a stone in response to a lithotripter shock wave.
    Chitnis PV; Cleveland RO
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Apr; 119(4):1929-32. PubMed ID: 16642802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Turbulent water coupling in shock wave lithotripsy.
    Lautz J; Sankin G; Zhong P
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 58(3):735-48. PubMed ID: 23322027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modified shock waves for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy: a simulation based on the Gilmore formulation.
    Canseco G; de Icaza-Herrera M; Fernández F; Loske AM
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Oct; 51(7):803-10. PubMed ID: 21459398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamics of bubble oscillation in constrained media and mechanisms of vessel rupture in SWL.
    Zhong P; Zhou Y; Zhu S
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2001 Jan; 27(1):119-34. PubMed ID: 11295278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cloud cavitation control for lithotripsy using high intensity focused ultrasound.
    Ikeda T; Yoshizawa S; Tosaki M; Allen JS; Takagi S; Ohta N; Kitamura T; Matsumoto Y
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1383-97. PubMed ID: 16965979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High intensity focused ultrasound lithotripsy with cavitating microbubbles.
    Yoshizawa S; Ikeda T; Ito A; Ota R; Takagi S; Matsumoto Y
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Aug; 47(8):851-60. PubMed ID: 19360448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suppressing bubble shielding effect in shock wave lithotripsy by low intensity pulsed ultrasound.
    Wang JC; Zhou Y
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Jan; 55():65-74. PubMed ID: 25173067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of frequency doubled double pulse Nd:YAG laser fiber proximity to the target stone on transient cavitation and acoustic emission.
    Fuh E; Haleblian GE; Norris RD; Albala WD; Simmons N; Zhong P; Preminger GM
    J Urol; 2007 Apr; 177(4):1542-5. PubMed ID: 17382775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acoustic emission and sonoluminescence due to cavitation at the beam focus of an electrohydraulic shock wave lithotripter.
    Coleman AJ; Choi MJ; Saunders JE; Leighton TG
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1992; 18(3):267-81. PubMed ID: 1595133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improvement of stone fragmentation during shock-wave lithotripsy using a combined EH/PEAA shock-wave generator-in vitro experiments.
    Xi X; Zhong P
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2000 Mar; 26(3):457-67. PubMed ID: 10773377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reduction of bubble cavitation by modifying the diffraction wave from a lithotripter aperture.
    Zhou Y
    J Endourol; 2012 Aug; 26(8):1075-84. PubMed ID: 22332839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cavitation cluster dynamics in shock-wave lithotripsy: part 1. Free field.
    Arora M; Junge L; Ohl CD
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Jun; 31(6):827-39. PubMed ID: 15936498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dual-pulse lithotripter accelerates stone fragmentation and reduces cell lysis in vitro.
    Sokolov DL; Bailey MR; Crum LA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2003 Jul; 29(7):1045-52. PubMed ID: 12878251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.