These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1157239)
1. Objective and subjective analysis of left ventricular angiograms. Chaitman BR; DeMots H; Bristow JD; Rösch J; Rahimtoola SH Circulation; 1975 Sep; 52(3):420-5. PubMed ID: 1157239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Analysis of interobserver variations in the estimation of myocardial volume, thickness and mass in right anterior oblique monoplanar angiocardiography]. Durand JP; Correia J; Nantu X; Delaye J; Beaune J; Pourchaire J; Convert G Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1982 May; 75(5):527-37. PubMed ID: 6810784 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation of 10-milliliter digital subtraction ventriculograms compared with standard cineangiograms. Tobis JM; Nalcioglu O; Johnston WD; Seibert A; Roeck W; Iseri LT; Elkayam U; Henry WL Am Heart J; 1983 Jun; 105(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 6344605 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of bias on the subjective interpretation of cardiac angiograms. Diamond GA; Vas R; Forrester JS; Xiang HZ; Whiting J; Pfaff M; Swan HJ Am Heart J; 1984 Jan; 107(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 6691242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The apical long-axis rather than the two-chamber view should be used in combination with the four-chamber view for accurate assessment of left ventricular volumes and function. Nosir YF; Vletter WB; Boersma E; Frowijn R; Ten Cate FJ; Fioretti PM; Roelandt JR Eur Heart J; 1997 Jul; 18(7):1175-85. PubMed ID: 9243153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of left ventricular contractile pattern by intravenous digital subtraction ventriculography: comparison with cineangiography and assessment of interobserver variability. Nissen SE; Booth D; Waters J; Fassas T; DeMaria AN Am J Cardiol; 1983 Dec; 52(10):1293-8. PubMed ID: 6359852 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual versus computerised assessment of left ventricular function from cinéangiography. Qureshi SA; Pridie RB; Parnell B; Hudson R; Thompson R; Towers M; Westbury H Br J Radiol; 1983 Sep; 56(669):637-40. PubMed ID: 6883030 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Usefulness of digital subtraction left ventriculography in patients with ischemic heart disease: comparison with cineangiography. Paquet E; Bourassa MG; Lespérance J; Laurier J; Dyrda I; Lemarbre L; Bonan R; Joyal M; Corcos T J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Dec; 35(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 6396303 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of single-plane and biplane contrast analyses of right ventricular function and size. Slutsky R; Bhargava V; Dittrich H; Costello D Am Heart J; 1982 Jul; 104(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 7090967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Left ventricular function in patients with and without myocardial infarction and one, two or three vessel coronary artery disease. Moraski RE; Russell RO; Smith MK; Rackley CE Am J Cardiol; 1975 Jan; 35(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 1109238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Cineangiographic left ventricular dimensional analysis in normal subjects and patients with coronary disease]. Schönbeck M; Rutishauser W; Krayenbühl HP; Lichtlen P; Wellauer J Z Kardiol; 1975 Mar; 64(3):221-38. PubMed ID: 1130127 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of selective left ventriculograms with levophase ("forward") ventriculograms in patients with coronary artery disease. Ferlinz J; Herman MV; Cohn PF; Gorlin R Am Heart J; 1976 Jun; 91(6):721-5. PubMed ID: 1274822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radionuclide angiocardiography, a noninvasive method for evaluating left ventricular ejection fraction and regional wall motion; comparison with contrast left ventricular angiography. Kostuk WJ; Chamberlain MJ; Sang HC Can Med Assoc J; 1978 Oct; 119(8):877-83. PubMed ID: 757954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Quantitative study of left ventricular function by two-dimensional echocardiography]. Guéret P; Corday E Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Mar; 74(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 6782993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Noninvasive assessment of left ventricular dynamics (author's transl)]. Sauer E; Sebening H; Hör G; Lutilsky L; Dressler J; Bofilias I; Weber N; Pabst HW; Blömer H Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1978 Jul; 103(30):1199-202, 1205-6. PubMed ID: 668560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function with a 16-slice spiral-CT using two different software tools for quantitative functional analysis and qualitative evaluation of wall motion changes in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging]. Koch K; Oellig F; Kunz P; Bender P; Oberholzer K; Mildenberger P; Hake U; Kreitner KF; Thelen M Rofo; 2004 Dec; 176(12):1786-93. PubMed ID: 15573290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative assessment of regional left ventricular function by densitometric analysis of digital-subtraction ventriculograms: correlation with myocardial systolic shortening in dogs. Chappuis F; Widmann T; Guth B; Nicod P; Peterson KL Circulation; 1988 Feb; 77(2):457-67. PubMed ID: 3276410 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improvement in left ventricular wall motion following nitroglycerin. McAnulty JH; Hattenhauer MT; Rösch J; Kloster FE; Rahimtoola SH Circulation; 1975 Jan; 51(1):140-5. PubMed ID: 803232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sources of subjective variability in the assessment of left ventricular regional wall motion from contrast ventriculograms. Kussmaul WG; Kleaveland JP; Zeevi GR; Hirshfeld JW Am J Cardiol; 1987 Jul; 60(1):153-7. PubMed ID: 3604930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]