BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11573755)

  • 21. Validation of a self-administered diet history questionnaire using multiple diet records.
    Block G; Woods M; Potosky A; Clifford C
    J Clin Epidemiol; 1990; 43(12):1327-35. PubMed ID: 2254769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Correlates of fat intake behaviors in participants in the eating for a healthy life study.
    Hart A; Tinker L; Bowen DJ; Longton G; Beresford SA
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2006 Oct; 106(10):1605-13. PubMed ID: 17000193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dietary fat reduction strategies used by a group of adults aged 50 years and older.
    Abusabha R; Hsieh KH; Achterberg C
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2001 Sep; 101(9):1024-30. PubMed ID: 11573753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effects of a controlled worksite environmental intervention on determinants of dietary behavior and self-reported fruit, vegetable and fat intake.
    Engbers LH; van Poppel MN; Chin A Paw M; van Mechelen W
    BMC Public Health; 2006 Oct; 6():253. PubMed ID: 17044935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Correlates of maintenance of a low-fat diet among women in the Women's Health Trial.
    Urban N; White E; Anderson GL; Curry S; Kristal AR
    Prev Med; 1992 May; 21(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 1614990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The Eating Pattern Assessment Tool: a simple instrument for assessing dietary fat and cholesterol intake.
    Peters JR; Quiter ES; Brekke ML; Admire J; Brekke MJ; Mullis RM; Hunninghake DB
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1994 Sep; 94(9):1008-13. PubMed ID: 8071482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dietary assessment instruments are susceptible to intervention-associated response set bias.
    Kristal AR; Andrilla CH; Koepsell TD; Diehr PH; Cheadle A
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1998 Jan; 98(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 9434649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Women's dietary fat and sugar intakes: implications for food based guidelines.
    Flynn MA; Sugrue DD; Codd MB; Gibney MJ
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 50(11):713-9. PubMed ID: 8933116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Maintenance of a low-fat diet: follow-up of the Women's Health Trial.
    White E; Shattuck AL; Kristal AR; Urban N; Prentice RL; Henderson MM; Insull W; Moskowitz M; Goldman S; Woods MN
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1992; 1(4):315-23. PubMed ID: 1338896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Women participating in a dietary intervention trial maintain dietary changes without much effect on household members.
    Radakovich K; Heilbrun LK; Venkatranamamoorthy R; Lababidi S; Klurfeld DM; Djuric Z
    Nutr Cancer; 2006; 55(1):44-52. PubMed ID: 16965240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reliability and validity of the SmartDiet Canadian version questionnaire.
    Wiens L; Schulzer M; Chen C; Parinas K
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2010 Jan; 110(1):101-5. PubMed ID: 20102834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Dietary changes among husbands of participants in a low-fat dietary intervention.
    White E; Hurlich M; Thompson RS; Woods MN; Henderson MM; Urban N; Kristal A
    Am J Prev Med; 1991; 7(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 1790038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implementing a low-fat eating plan in the Women's Intervention Nutrition Study.
    Hoy MK; Winters BL; Chlebowski RT; Papoutsakis C; Shapiro A; Lubin MP; Thomson CA; Grosvenor MB; Copeland T; Falk E; Day K; Blackburn GL
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2009 Apr; 109(4):688-96. PubMed ID: 19328264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Assessment of habitual energy and macronutrient intake in adults: comparison of a seven day food record with a dietary history interview.
    Høidrup S; Andreasen AH; Osler M; Pedersen AN; Jørgensen LM; Jørgensen T; Schroll M; Heitmann BL
    Eur J Clin Nutr; 2002 Feb; 56(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 11857043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Incorporating fat-modified foods into a food frequency questionnaire improves classification of fat intake.
    Vandenlangenberg GM; Mares-Perlman JA; Brady WE; Klein BE; Klein R; Palta M; Block G
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1997 Aug; 97(8):860-6. PubMed ID: 9259707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Fat-gram counting and food-record rating are equally effective for evaluating food records in reduced-fat diets.
    Roy DS; Kimball KT; Mendoza-Martinez H; Mateski DJ; Insull W
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1997 Sep; 97(9):987-90. PubMed ID: 9284876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Patterns of dietary behavior associated with selecting diets low in fat: reliability and validity of a behavioral approach to dietary assessment.
    Kristal AR; Shattuck AL; Henry HJ
    J Am Diet Assoc; 1990 Feb; 90(2):214-20. PubMed ID: 2303658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The polyp prevention trial II: dietary intervention program and participant baseline dietary characteristics.
    Lanza E; Schatzkin A; Ballard-Barbash R; Corle D; Clifford C; Paskett E; Hayes D; Bote E; Caan B; Shike M; Weissfeld J; Slattery M; Mateski D; Daston C
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 1996 May; 5(5):385-92. PubMed ID: 9162305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Developing a scoring method for evaluating dietary methodology in reviews of epidemiologic studies.
    Dennis LK; Snetselaar LG; Nothwehr FK; Stewart RE
    J Am Diet Assoc; 2003 Apr; 103(4):483-7. PubMed ID: 12669012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Measuring dietary change in a diet intervention trial: comparing food frequency questionnaire and dietary recalls.
    Thomson CA; Giuliano A; Rock CL; Ritenbaugh CK; Flatt SW; Faerber S; Newman V; Caan B; Graver E; Hartz V; Whitacre R; Parker F; Pierce JP; Marshall JR
    Am J Epidemiol; 2003 Apr; 157(8):754-62. PubMed ID: 12697580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.