These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11573878)
21. Towards assessing the preferred usage features of upper limb prostheses: most important items regarding prosthesis use in people with major unilateral upper limb absence-a Dutch national survey. Kerver N; van der Sluis CK; van Twillert S; Krabbe PFM Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Dec; 44(24):7554-7565. PubMed ID: 34813394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Survey of upper limb prosthesis users in Sweden, the United Kingdom and Canada. Kyberd PJ; Hill W Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 21697204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Fabrication and application of an adjustable myoelectric transhumeral prosthetic socket. Schofield JS; Schoepp KR; Stobbe M; Marasco PD; Hebert JS Prosthet Orthot Int; 2019 Oct; 43(5):564-567. PubMed ID: 30922181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Differences in myoelectric and body-powered upper-limb prostheses: Systematic literature review. Carey SL; Lura DJ; Highsmith MJ; ; J Rehabil Res Dev; 2015; 52(3):247-62. PubMed ID: 26230500 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Users' and therapists' perceptions of myoelectric multi-function upper limb prostheses with conventional and pattern recognition control. Franzke AW; Kristoffersen MB; Bongers RM; Murgia A; Pobatschnig B; Unglaube F; van der Sluis CK PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0220899. PubMed ID: 31465469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. An evaluation of the use made of cosmetic and functional prostheses by unilateral upper limb amputees. Fraser CM Prosthet Orthot Int; 1998 Dec; 22(3):216-23. PubMed ID: 9881609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of prosthetic usage in upper limb amputees. Dudkiewicz I; Gabrielov R; Seiv-Ner I; Zelig G; Heim M Disabil Rehabil; 2004 Jan; 26(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 14660200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Functional comparison of upper extremity amputees using myoelectric and conventional prostheses. Stein RB; Walley M Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1983 Jun; 64(6):243-8. PubMed ID: 6860093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Controlling a multi-degree of freedom upper limb prosthesis using foot controls: user experience. Resnik L; Klinger SL; Etter K; Fantini C Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2014 Jul; 9(4):318-29. PubMed ID: 23902465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The influence of environment: Experiences of users of myoelectric arm prosthesis-a qualitative study. Widehammar C; Pettersson I; Janeslätt G; Hermansson L Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 28470129 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Body schema and body awareness of amputees. Mayer A; Kudar K; Bretz K; Tihanyi J Prosthet Orthot Int; 2008 Sep; 32(3):363-82. PubMed ID: 18677671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A new approach for the pistoning measurement in transtibial prosthesis. Gholizadeh H; Abu Osman NA; Lúvíksdóttir Á; Eshraghi A; Kamyab M; Wan Abas WA Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Dec; 35(4):360-4. PubMed ID: 21975850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Do users want to receive a DEKA Arm and why? Overall findings from the Veterans Affairs Study to optimize the DEKA Arm. Resnik L; Latlief G; Klinger SL; Sasson N; Walters LS Prosthet Orthot Int; 2014 Dec; 38(6):456-66. PubMed ID: 24286806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A novel gel liner system with embedded electrodes for use with upper limb myoelectric prostheses. Reissman T; Halsne E; Lipschutz R; Miller L; Kuiken T PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0198934. PubMed ID: 29912908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Remote fitting procedures for upper limb 3d printed prostheses. Zuniga JM; Young KJ; Peck JL; Srivastava R; Pierce JE; Dudley DR; Salazar DA; Bergmann J Expert Rev Med Devices; 2019 Mar; 16(3):257-266. PubMed ID: 30661413 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Assessing physical function in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees by combining the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Questionnaire and clinical examination. Ostlie K; Franklin RJ; Skjeldal OH; Skrondal A; Magnus P Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 92(10):1636-45. PubMed ID: 21872841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Surveying the interest of individuals with upper limb loss in novel prosthetic control techniques. Engdahl SM; Christie BP; Kelly B; Davis A; Chestek CA; Gates DH J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2015 Jun; 12():53. PubMed ID: 26071402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Hygiene problems of residual limb and silicone liners in transtibial amputees wearing the total surface bearing socket. Hachisuka K; Nakamura T; Ohmine S; Shitama H; Shinkoda K Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2001 Sep; 82(9):1286-90. PubMed ID: 11552206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Suspension effect and dynamic evaluation of the total surface bearing (TSB) trans-tibial prosthesis: a comparison with the patellar tendon bearing (PTB) trans-tibial prosthesis. Narita H; Yokogushi K; Shii S; Kakizawa M; Nosaka T Prosthet Orthot Int; 1997 Dec; 21(3):175-8. PubMed ID: 9453088 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Residual limb wounds or ulcers heal in transtibial amputees using an active suction socket system. A randomized controlled study. Traballesi M; Delussu AS; Fusco A; Iosa M; Averna T; Pellegrini R; Brunelli S Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2012 Dec; 48(4):613-23. PubMed ID: 22641248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]