These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11573878)
41. Silicone suspension of external prostheses. A new era in artificial limb usage. Heim M; Wershavski M; Zwas ST; Siev-Ner I; Nadvorna H; Azaria M J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1997 Jul; 79(4):638-40. PubMed ID: 9250755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Moisture permeability of the total surface bearing prosthetic socket with a silicone liner: is it superior to the patella-tendon bearing prosthetic socket? Hachisuka K; Matsushima Y; Ohmine S; Shitama H; Shinkoda K J UOEH; 2001 Sep; 23(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 11570046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Dimensional change in muscle as a control signal for powered upper limb prostheses: a pilot study. Kenney LP; Lisitsa I; Bowker P; Heath GH; Howard D Med Eng Phys; 1999 Oct; 21(8):589-97. PubMed ID: 10672794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A field evaluation of arm prostheses for unilateral amputees. van Lunteren A; van Lunteren-Gerritsen GH; Stassen HG; Zuithoff MJ Prosthet Orthot Int; 1983 Dec; 7(3):141-51. PubMed ID: 6647010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Evaluation of polypropylene prostheses designed by the International Committee of the Red Cross for trans-tibial amputees. Jensen JS; Heim S Prosthet Orthot Int; 2000 Apr; 24(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 10855438 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Clinical results of an investigation of paediatric upper limb myoelectric prosthesis fitting at the Quebec Rehabilitation Institute. Routhier F; Vincent C; Morissette MJ; Desaulniers L Prosthet Orthot Int; 2001 Aug; 25(2):119-31. PubMed ID: 11573879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Qualitative study of prosthetic suspension systems on transtibial amputees' satisfaction and perceived problems with their prosthetic devices. Ali S; Abu Osman NA; Naqshbandi MM; Eshraghi A; Kamyab M; Gholizadeh H Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 93(11):1919-23. PubMed ID: 22579945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Upper-limb prosthetics: critical factors in device abandonment. Biddiss E; Chau T Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Dec; 86(12):977-87. PubMed ID: 18090439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prosthetic limb use in Australia 1981-1985 under the Free Limb Scheme. Jones LE Prosthet Orthot Int; 1989 Aug; 13(2):76-81. PubMed ID: 2780264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [Outcome of early fitting by silicone liner with lock system for dysvascular below-knee amputation: assessment of walking abilities by a specific questionnaire]. Cazabon L; Casillas JM; Ader P; Grumler B; Lothe M; Dulieu V Ann Readapt Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 48(3):118-25. PubMed ID: 15833259 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Colorimetric analysis of silicone cosmetic prostheses for upper-limb amputees. Bicchierini M; Davalli A; Sacchetti R; Paganelli S J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(5):655-64. PubMed ID: 16586191 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Prosthesis use in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees: patterns of wear, prosthetic skills and the actual use of prostheses in activities of daily life. Østlie K; Lesjø IM; Franklin RJ; Garfelt B; Skjeldal OH; Magnus P Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2012 Nov; 7(6):479-93. PubMed ID: 22315926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Implications of prosthesis funding structures on the use of prostheses: experiences of individuals with upper limb absence. Biddiss E; McKeever P; Lindsay S; Chau T Prosthet Orthot Int; 2011 Jun; 35(2):215-24. PubMed ID: 21515898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. A questionnaire survey of the effect of different interface types on patient satisfaction and perceived problems among trans-tibial amputees. Van de Weg FB; Van der Windt DA Prosthet Orthot Int; 2005 Dec; 29(3):231-9. PubMed ID: 16466153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Save that arm: a study of problems in the remaining arm of unilateral upper limb amputees. Jones LE; Davidson JH Prosthet Orthot Int; 1999 Apr; 23(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 10355644 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Integration of surface electromyographic sensors with the transfemoral amputee socket: a comparison of four differing configurations. Hefferman GM; Zhang F; Nunnery MJ; Huang H Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Apr; 39(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 24469430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Subjective benefits of energy storing prostheses. Alaranta H; Lempinen VM; Haavisto E; Pohjolainen T; Hurri H Prosthet Orthot Int; 1994 Aug; 18(2):92-7. PubMed ID: 7991366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Visualisation of upper limb activity using spirals: A new approach to the assessment of daily prosthesis usage. Chadwell A; Kenney L; Granat M; Thies S; Head JS; Galpin A Prosthet Orthot Int; 2018 Feb; 42(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 28650213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. A preliminary examination of the relationship between employment, pain and disability in an amputee population. Whyte AS; Carroll LJ Disabil Rehabil; 2002 Jun; 24(9):462-70. PubMed ID: 12097215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]