These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11574078)

  • 1. Peer review.
    Livingston EH; Harwell JD
    Am J Surg; 2001 Aug; 182(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 11574078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act in the courts: fast-acting cure for physician peer review headaches?
    Donovan RE
    J Health Hosp Law; 1995; 28(5):257-68, 312. PubMed ID: 10156292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review immunity: history, operation, and recent decisions--has HCQIA accomplished its goals?
    Cassidy MA
    Health Care Law Mon; 2002 May; ():3-9. PubMed ID: 12436737
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality assurance implications of federal peer review laws. The Health Care Quality Improvement Act and the National Practitioner Data Bank.
    Snelson E
    Qual Assur Util Rev; 1992; 7(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 1603858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Health Care Quality Improvement Act and NPDB: where are we now?
    Brennan ED
    QRC Advis; 1999 Nov; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 10622805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Peer review and antitrust.
    Sfikas PM
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1997 Apr; 128(4):496-8. PubMed ID: 9103804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Laws governing peer immunity, physician credentialing upheld.
    Senft DJ
    Manag Care; 2002 Feb; 11(2):62-3. PubMed ID: 11904916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The National Practitioner Data Bank: the first 18 months.
    Puryear MA; Politzer RM; Anderson J; Mullan F
    Physician Exec; 1993; 19(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 10125933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The National Practitioner Data Bank: coping with the uncertainties.
    Lovitky JA
    J Health Law; 2000; 33(2):355-79. PubMed ID: 11010448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical peer review in the United States: history, legal development and subsequent abuse.
    Vyas D; Hozain AE
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jun; 20(21):6357-63. PubMed ID: 24914357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. State medical peer review: high cost but no benefit--is it time for a change?
    Scheutzow SO
    Am J Law Med; 1999; 25(1):7-60. PubMed ID: 10207570
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer review immunity? Think again: recent developments in federal and state law.
    Spevak C
    Physician Exec; 2007; 33(3):76-8. PubMed ID: 17539569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Civil rights claims and physician peer review.
    Kadzielski M; Marino SP
    Cost Qual Q J; 1999 Jun; 5(2):10-4. PubMed ID: 10539004
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Hospital peer review and clinical privileges actions: to report or not report.
    Brennan TA
    JAMA; 1999 Jul; 282(4):381-2. PubMed ID: 10432038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Special report on medical staff relationships. Ninth Circuit buttresses peer review immunities.
    Penner I
    Health Care Law Newsl; 1994 Nov; 9(11):15-20. PubMed ID: 10137766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Facing the limits on uses of medical and peer review information: are high technology and confidentiality on a collision course?
    Brown LC; Stanton WC; Paye W
    Whittier Law Rev; 1997; 19(1):97-118. PubMed ID: 12071205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. When does a review constitute an investigation and what is a surrender?
    Hosp Law Newsl; 2000 Sep; 17(11):1-3. PubMed ID: 11186478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The fox guarding the henhouse: how the Health Care Quality Improvement Act of 1986 and State peer review protection statutes have helped protect bad faith peer review in the medical community.
    van Geertruyden YH
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 2001; 18(1):239-71. PubMed ID: 15255061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data bank has operational impact. Proper peer review can protect hospitals from antitrust and defamation suits.
    Purtell DL
    Health Prog; 1990 Nov; 71(9):66-71. PubMed ID: 10107457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The National Practitioner Data Bank and the quality of peer review.
    Frable FL
    JAMA; 2000 Feb; 283(7):886; author reply 887. PubMed ID: 10685708
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.