These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

86 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11575100)

  • 1. Effects of organic, hydraulic and fat shocks on the performance of UASB reactors with intermittent operation.
    Nadais H; Capela I; Arroja L; Duarte A
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(4):49-56. PubMed ID: 11575100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of non-feeding period length on the intermittent operation of UASB reactors treating dairy effluents.
    Coelho NM; Rodrigues AA; Arroja LM; Capela IF
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Feb; 96(2):244-9. PubMed ID: 16900520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.
    Bal AS; Dhagat NN
    Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimum cycle time for intermittent UASB reactors treating dairy wastewater.
    Nadais H; Capela I; Arroja L; Duarte A
    Water Res; 2005 Apr; 39(8):1511-8. PubMed ID: 15878022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Post-treatment of anaerobic effluents in an overland flow system.
    Chernicharo CA; Cota RS; Zerbini AM; von Sperling M; Brito LH
    Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(4):229-36. PubMed ID: 11579922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Feasibility studies on the treatment of dairy wastewaters with upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors.
    Ramasamy EV; Gajalakshmi S; Sanjeevi R; Jithesh MN; Abbasi SA
    Bioresour Technol; 2004 Jun; 93(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 15051084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Treatment of fish processing wastewater in a one- or two-step upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactor.
    Palenzuela-Rollon A; Zeeman G; Lubberding HJ; Lettinga G; Alaerts GJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(10):207-12. PubMed ID: 12188546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Degradation of 4-chlorophenol in UASB reactor under methanogenic conditions.
    Majumder PS; Gupta SK
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jul; 99(10):4169-77. PubMed ID: 17928222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dispersion and treatment performance analysis of an UASB reactor under different hydraulic loading rates.
    Peña MR; Mara DD; Avella GP
    Water Res; 2006 Feb; 40(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 16405944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of high salinity on the fate of methanol during the start-up of thermophilic (55 degrees C) sulfate reducing reactors.
    Vallero MV; Hulshoff Pol LW; Lens PN; Lettinga G
    Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(10):121-6. PubMed ID: 12188531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of hydraulic retention time on the biodegradation of complex phenolic mixture from simulated coal wastewater in hybrid UASB reactors.
    Ramakrishnan A; Gupta SK
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 May; 153(1-2):843-51. PubMed ID: 17950527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of temperature on performance, microbiological, and hydrodynamic aspects of UASB reactors treating municipal wastewater.
    Singh KS; Viraraghavan T
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(6):211-7. PubMed ID: 14640220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improved nitrogen removal in upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors by incorporation of Anammox bacteria into the granular sludge.
    Schmidt JE; Batstone DJ; Angelidaki I
    Water Sci Technol; 2004; 49(11-12):69-76. PubMed ID: 15303725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of carbon sources and shock loading on the removal of chlorophenols in sequential anaerobic-aerobic reactors.
    Majumder PS; Gupta SK
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 May; 99(8):2930-7. PubMed ID: 17706423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Post-treatment of UASB effluent in an expanded granular sludge bed reactor type using flocculent sludge.
    Kato MT; Florencio L; Arantes RF
    Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(6):279-84. PubMed ID: 14640229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of empirical models for performance evaluation of UASB reactors treating poultry manure wastewater under different operational conditions.
    Yetilmezsoy K; Sakar S
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 May; 153(1-2):532-43. PubMed ID: 17913349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of process stability on anaerobic biodegradation of LAS in UASB reactors.
    Løbner T; Toräng L; Batstone DJ; Schmidt JE; Angelidaki I
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2005 Mar; 89(7):759-65. PubMed ID: 15696511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of very shallow ponds treating effluents from UASB reactors.
    von Sperling M; Mascarenhas LC
    Water Sci Technol; 2005; 51(12):83-90. PubMed ID: 16114667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The performance of UASB reactors treating high-strength wastewaters.
    Aslan S; Sekerdağ N
    J Environ Health; 2008; 70(6):32-6, 51, 55. PubMed ID: 18236935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of effluent recycling and shock loading on the biodegradation of complex phenolic mixture in hybrid UASB reactors.
    Ramakrishnan A; Gupta SK
    Bioresour Technol; 2008 Jun; 99(9):3745-53. PubMed ID: 17714941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.