168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11575646)
21. False-positive squamous cell carcinoma in cervical smears: cytologic-histologic correlation in 19 cases.
Levine PH; Elgert PA; Mittal K
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jan; 28(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 12508178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy and reproducibility of telecytology diagnosis of cervical smears. A tool for quality assurance programs.
Lee ES; Kim IS; Choi JS; Yeom BW; Kim HK; Han JH; Lee MS; Leong AS
Am J Clin Pathol; 2003 Mar; 119(3):356-60. PubMed ID: 12645336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Bethesda Interobserver Reproducibility Study (BIRST): a web-based assessment of the Bethesda 2001 System for classifying cervical cytology.
Sherman ME; Dasgupta A; Schiffman M; Nayar R; Solomon D
Cancer; 2007 Feb; 111(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 17186503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Reproducibility of cytologic diagnosis: study of CRISAP Ile-de-France].
Barrès D; Bergeron C
Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2000 Feb; 28(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 10758586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Follow-up of women with cervical cytological abnormalities showing atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion: a nationwide cohort study.
Sundström K; Lu D; Elfström KM; Wang J; Andrae B; Dillner J; Sparén P
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 216(1):48.e1-48.e15. PubMed ID: 27457115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Consistency of cytology diagnosis for cervical cancer between two laboratories.
Sriamporn S; Kritpetcharat O; Nieminen P; Suwanrungraung K; Kamsa-ard S; Parkin DM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2005; 6(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 16101335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Eliminating the diagnosis atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance: impact on the accuracy of the Papanicolaou test.
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Singh V; Sehgal A; Mitra AB
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(6):783-7. PubMed ID: 15581162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Observer variation in cytologic grading for cervical dysplasia of Papanicolaou smears with the PAPNET testing system.
Doornewaard H; van der Schouw YT; van der Graaf Y; Bos AB; van den Tweel JG
Cancer; 1999 Aug; 87(4):178-83. PubMed ID: 10455204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver variability using select cytologic criteria.
Raab SS; Snider TE; Potts SA; McDaniel HL; Robinson RA; Nelson DL; Sigman JD; Thomas PA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1997 Mar; 107(3):299-307. PubMed ID: 9052380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Interobserver reproducibility with LiquiPrep liquid-based cervical cytology screening in a developing country.
Settakorn J; Rangdaeng S; Preechapornkul N; Nateewatana S; Pongsiralai K; Srisomboon J; Thorner PS
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 18439084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Clinical significance of a cytologic diagnosis of atypical glandular cells, favor endometrial origin, in Pap smears.
Saad RS; Takei H; Liu YL; Silverman JE; Lipscomb JT; Ruiz B
Acta Cytol; 2006; 50(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 16514840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Use of a liquid-based, thin-layer Pap test in a community hospital. Impact on cytology performance and productivity.
Sass MA
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 14969176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Pap smears with glandular cell abnormalities: Are they detected by rapid prescreening?
Kanber Y; Charbonneau M; Auger M
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Dec; 123(12):739-44. PubMed ID: 26348845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Daily peer review of abnormal cervical smears in the assessment of individual practice as an additional method of internal quality control.
Confortini M; Di Stefano C; Biggeri A; Bulgaresi P; Di Claudio G; Grisotto L; Maddau C; Matucci M; Petreschi C; Troni GM; Turco P; Foxi P
Cytopathology; 2016 Feb; 27(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 25123613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Detection of high-grade lesions on cell blocks from residual fluids of Pap smears diagnosed as low-grade abnormalities: a preliminary pilot study.
Catteau X; Simon P; Noël JC
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 22555525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. ThinPrep Pap Test. Accuracy for glandular disease.
Ashfaq R; Gibbons D; Vela C; Saboorian MH; Iliya F
Acta Cytol; 1999; 43(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 9987455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cytohistologic correlation rates between conventional Papanicolaou smears and ThinPrep cervical cytology: a comparison.
Chacho MS; Mattie ME; Schwartz PE
Cancer; 2003 Jun; 99(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 12811853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Expression of p16INK4A in Pap smears containing atypical glandular cells from the uterine cervix.
Nieh S; Chen SF; Chu TY; Lai HC; Fu E
Acta Cytol; 2004; 48(2):173-80. PubMed ID: 15098536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Assessment of cytologic follow-up as the recommended management for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Alanen KW; Elit LM; Molinaro PA; McLachlin CM
Cancer; 1998 Feb; 84(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 9500646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reproducibility of telecytology diagnosis of cervical smears in a quality assurance program: the Georgian experience.
Kldiashvili E; Schrader T
Telemed J E Health; 2011 Sep; 17(7):565-8. PubMed ID: 21851161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
