39 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11575648)
1. Assessing the impact of lubricant on liquid-based Pap smear test outcomes: a randomized clinical trial.
Yaraghi M; Gharavi S; Najafian A; Hazari V
Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2024 May; 86(5):2702-2707. PubMed ID: 38694378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening.
Patel N; Bavikar R; Buch A; Kulkarni M; Dharwadkar A; Viswanathan V
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2023; 12(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 37416097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance of the Cellslide
Michelow P; Sherrin A; Rossouw L; Mohaleamolla S; Evans D; Swarts A; Rakhombe N; Smith JS; Firnhaber C
Afr J Lab Med; 2016; 5(1):278. PubMed ID: 28879102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparative analysis of conventional and SurePath liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology: A study of 140 cases.
Sharma J; Toi PCh; Siddaraju N; Sundareshan M; Habeebullah S
J Cytol; 2016; 33(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 27279683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving sensitivity of cervical cytology by removal of cervical secretions before sampling: a prospective study in Mexico.
Curiel-Valdés JJ; Briones-Pimentel J; Bandala C
Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(9):5895-901. PubMed ID: 25337232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pooled analysis of the performance of liquid-based cytology in population-based cervical cancer screening studies in China.
Pan QJ; Hu SY; Zhang X; Ci PW; Zhang WH; Guo HQ; Cao J; Zhao FH; Lytwyn A; Qiao YL
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Sep; 121(9):473-82. PubMed ID: 23907807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical utility of Liqui-PREP™ cytology system for primary cervical cancer screening in a large urban hospital setting in China.
Deshou H; Changhua W; Qinyan L; Wei L; Wen F
J Cytol; 2009 Jan; 26(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 21938144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Newly developed liquid-based cytology. TACAS™: cytological appearance and HPV testing using liquid-based sample.
Kubushiro K; Taoka H; Sakurai N; Yamamoto Y; Kurasaki A; Asakawa Y; Iwahara M; Takahashi K
Hum Cell; 2011 Sep; 24(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 21656277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of conventional and liquid-based cytology, and human papillomavirus testing using SurePath preparation in Japan.
Taoka H; Yamamoto Y; Sakurai N; Fukuda M; Asakawa Y; Kurasaki A; Oharaseki T; Kubushiro K
Hum Cell; 2010 Nov; 23(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 21166883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of liquid based versus conventional cytology: overall results of new technologies for cervical cancer screening: randomised controlled trial.
Ronco G; Cuzick J; Pierotti P; Cariaggi MP; Dalla Palma P; Naldoni C; Ghiringhello B; Giorgi-Rossi P; Minucci D; Parisio F; Pojer A; Schiboni ML; Sintoni C; Zorzi M; Segnan N; Confortini M
BMJ; 2007 Jul; 335(7609):28. PubMed ID: 17517761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficiency of an inexpensive liquid-based cytology performed by cytocentrifugations: a comparative study using the histology as reference standard.
Garbar C; Mascaux C; Fontaine V
Cytojournal; 2005 Sep; 2():15. PubMed ID: 16164754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical cleaning improves Pap smear quality.
Kotaska AJ; Matisic JP
CMAJ; 2003 Sep; 169(7):666-9. PubMed ID: 14517124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears.
Negri G; Menia E; Egarter-Vigl E; Vittadello F; Mian C
Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): a result not to be ignored.
Barreth D; Schepansky A; Capstick V; Johnson G; Steed H; Faught W
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Dec; 28(12):1095-1098. PubMed ID: 17169233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and application to present practice.
Cox JT
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2004 Nov; 2(6):597-611. PubMed ID: 19780303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does liquid-based technology really improve detection of cervical neoplasia? A prospective, randomized trial comparing the ThinPrep Pap Test with the conventional Pap Test, including follow-up of HSIL cases.
Obwegeser JH; Brack S
Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(5):709-14. PubMed ID: 11575648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
