BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

40 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11575648)

  • 21. ThinPrep versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in the cytologic follow-up of women with equivocal cervical smears.
    Negri G; Menia E; Egarter-Vigl E; Vittadello F; Mian C
    Cancer; 2003 Dec; 99(6):342-5. PubMed ID: 14681941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of the ThinPrep Pap test in clinical practice. A seven-month, 16,314-case experience in northern Vermont.
    Papillo JL; Zarka MA; St John TL
    Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):203-8. PubMed ID: 9479341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The significance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion" as a distinct squamous abnormality category in Papanicolaou tests.
    Elsheikh TM; Kirkpatrick JL; Wu HH
    Cancer; 2006 Oct; 108(5):277-81. PubMed ID: 16937376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A thin-layer, liquid-based pap test for mass screening in an area of China with a high incidence of cervical carcinoma. A cross-sectional, comparative study.
    Pan Q; Belinson JL; Li L; Pretorius RG; Qiao YL; Zhang WH; Zhang X; Wu LY; Rong SD; Sun YT
    Acta Cytol; 2003; 47(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 12585030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Arbyn M; Bergeron C; Klinkhamer P; Martin-Hirsch P; Siebers AG; Bulten J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):167-77. PubMed ID: 18165406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Negative computer-imaged ThinPrep Pap test and positive hybrid capture2 HPV co-testing results: A quality assurance review.
    Rao R; Molina D; Halligan AM; Vakil B; Alperstein SA; Hoda RS
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Sep; 43(9):763-9. PubMed ID: 26173579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Gynecologic cytology on conventional and liquid-based preparations: a comprehensive review of similarities and differences.
    Hoda RS; Loukeris K; Abdul-Karim FW
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2013 Mar; 41(3):257-78. PubMed ID: 22508662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions.
    Lambrou NC; Twiggs LB
    Cancer J; 2003; 9(5):382-9. PubMed ID: 14690313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Does liquid-based technology really improve detection of cervical neoplasia? A prospective, randomized trial comparing the ThinPrep Pap Test with the conventional Pap Test, including follow-up of HSIL cases.
    Obwegeser JH; Brack S
    Acta Cytol; 2001; 45(5):709-14. PubMed ID: 11575648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Atypical squamous cells-cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (ASC-H): a result not to be ignored.
    Barreth D; Schepansky A; Capstick V; Johnson G; Steed H; Faught W
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2006 Dec; 28(12):1095-1098. PubMed ID: 17169233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and application to present practice.
    Cox JT
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2004 Nov; 2(6):597-611. PubMed ID: 19780303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The ThinPrep Pap test. A review of clinical studies.
    Linder J; Zahniser D
    Acta Cytol; 1997; 41(1):30-8. PubMed ID: 9022723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical importance of "low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, cannot exclude high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL-H)" terminology for cervical smears 5-year analysis of the positive predictive value of LSIL-H compared with ASC-H, LSIL, and HSIL in the detection of high-grade cervical lesions with a review of the literature.
    Ince U; Aydin O; Peker O
    Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 21211831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]     [New Search]
    of 2.